• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Refugee Law >Beyond Borders: Cosmopolitanism and Family Reunification for Refugees in Canada
【24h】

Beyond Borders: Cosmopolitanism and Family Reunification for Refugees in Canada

机译：跨越国界：世界主义和加拿大难民的家庭团聚

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Canada has committed to facilitate family reunification for refugees in both domestic and international law; however, Canada's current family reunification policies are insufficient. The imperfect implementation of family reunification in Canadian law may illustrate a deeper tension in refugee law, between cosmopolitanism and statism. Refugees are accepted in Canada based on cosmopolitan principles. Family reunification, on the other hand, is governed by Canadian immigration law, which adopts a more bordered approach to global migration. The Tibetan community in the Parkdale neighbourhood of Toronto is experiencing particular difficulties with family reunification. This community illustrates that reform of Canada's current family reunification program may be insufficient. A more radical shift may be required, to position family unity as a fundamental human right that, as with the right to freedom from persecution, takes precedence over state sovereignty.
机译：加拿大承诺按照国内法和国际法促进难民的家庭团聚；但是，加拿大目前的家庭团聚政策还不够。加拿大法律对家庭团聚的执行不完善，可能说明了大都会主义与国家主义之间难民法的更深层次的张力。加拿大根据大都会原则接受难民。另一方面，家庭团聚则受加拿大移民法的管辖，该法律对全球移民采取了更为边界化的方法。多伦多帕克代尔附近的藏族社区在家庭团聚方面遇到特别困难。该社区表明，加拿大目前的家庭团聚计划的改革可能不够。可能需要进行更根本的转变，将家庭团聚定位为一项基本人权，与免于遭受迫害的权利一样，其地位要高于国家主权。

著录项

  • 来源
    《International Journal of Refugee Law》 |2010年第3期|p.379-403|共25页
  • 作者

    Andrea Bradley*;

  • 作者单位

    *MES, JD. Judicial Law Clerk with the Ontario Superior Court of Justice;

    former Caseworker at Parkdale Community Legal Services;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号