• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Refugee Law >Critical Spaces in the Canadian Refugee Determination System: 1989–2002
【24h】

Critical Spaces in the Canadian Refugee Determination System: 1989–2002

机译：1989–2002年加拿大难民确定系统中的关键空间

获取原文
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This paper draws its conclusions from a multidisciplinary study of the refugee determination process in Canada, the aim of which was to examine the strengths and weaknesses of the system and to explore means of improving it through an in-depth analysis of the diversity of attitudes and perceptions of different actors involved in the process. The basic hypothesis is that the legitimacy of the action of the Immigration and Refugee Board (hereafter IRB) is challenged because of a series of disagreements on the way it operates. Using interviews with former Board members, as well as with other professional actors of the system (lawyers, NGO workers, interpreters, health professionals), we try to understand better the parameters of the problems facing the IRB on three sets of issues: the appointment and renewal of Board members; the relationships between Board members within the IRB; the evaluation of the evidence by Board members. All issues relate mainly to the principles of independence and impartiality of the IRB, as an expert administrative tribunal. In particular, using the idea of ‘critical space’ as a conceptual framework, this study tries to ascertain more precisely how critical spaces within the IRB were being used in order to foster a common culture of independence and impartiality within the institution, or not. This study covers the period 1989-2002: it signals reforms accomplished since and suggests more means for improvement.
机译：本文从对加拿大难民确定过程的多学科研究中得出结论，其目的是研究该系统的优缺点，并通过对态度和态度的多样性进行深入分析，探索改善该系统的方法。对参与过程的不同参与者的看法。基本假设是，移民和难民局（以下简称IRB）采取的行动的合法性受到质疑，因为其运作方式存在一系列分歧。通过与前董事会成员以及系统的其他专业参与者（律师，非政府组织工作者，口译员，卫生专业人员）进行访谈，我们试图更好地了解IRB在三组问题上面临的问题的参数：董事会成员的更新；内部评级委员会中董事会成员之间的关系；董事会成员对证据的评估。所有问题都主要涉及作为专家行政法庭的IRB独立和公正的原则。尤其是，本研究使用“关键空间”的概念框架，试图更精确地确定IRB内部关键空间的使用方式，从而在机构内部建立一种独立和公正的共同文化。这项研究涵盖了1989-2002年：它标志着此后的改革，并提出了更多的改进方法。

著录项

  • 来源
    《International Journal of Refugee Law》 |2008年第1期|50-122|共73页
  • 作者

    François Crépeau and Delphine Nakache;

  • 作者单位

    François Crépeau is a professor of international law at the University of Montreal Canada;

    Research Chair in International Migration Law and the Scientific Director of the Centre for International Studies (CÉRIUM). Delphine Nakache is a professor of law at the University of Alberta;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号