...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of water resources development >EU Water Framework Directive vs. Integrated Water Resources Management: The Seven Mismatches
【24h】

EU Water Framework Directive vs. Integrated Water Resources Management: The Seven Mismatches

机译:欧盟水框架指令与综合水资源管理:七个错配

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this paper is to analyze how the EU Water Framework Directive complies with the international principles concerning Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) agreed in major conferences. The outcomes of the International Conference on Water and Environment (Dublin, 1992), the Second World Water Forum (The Hague, 2000), the International Conference on Freshwater (Bonn, 2001), and the World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) (Johannesburg, 2002) were compared with the EU Water Framework Directive. Seven notable mismatches were found, even though several EU countries have played a leading role in those conferences. The question arises whether the outcome of these conferences is not efficient enough to influence EU policies-do the conferences just produce collections of idealistic buzzwords or is there a requirement for different principles regarding IWRM for developing countries and developed countries?
机译:本文的目的是分析欧盟水框架指令如何符合主要会议上商定的有关水资源综合管理(IWRM)的国际原则。国际水与环境会议(1992年,都柏林),第二届世界水论坛(2000年,海牙),国际淡水会议(2001年,波恩)和可持续发展问题世界首脑会议(WSSD)的成果(约翰内斯堡,2002年)与欧盟水框架指令进行了比较。尽管有几个欧盟国家在这些会议中起了主导作用,但发现了七个明显的不匹配。问题是这些会议的结果是否效率不足以影响欧盟的政策?这些会议只是产生了理想主义流行语的集合,还是对发展中国家和发达国家的IWRM有不同的要求?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号