...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International review of economics >Can the link between functional and personal income distribution enhance the analysis of inequality?
【24h】

Can the link between functional and personal income distribution enhance the analysis of inequality?

机译：功能性收入分配和个人收入分配之间的联系能否增强对不平等现象的分析？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The aim of this paper is to present a framework which links functional and personal income distribution. In the first part of the paper, Piketty’s book “Capital in the XXI Century” is briefly reviewed. Piketty’s framework is discussed arguing that it can only partially explain levels and changes within personal income distribution. Piketty links the returns from capital r to the rate of growth of national income g in a very innovative way comparing them within a macroeconomic framework. He claims that when returns on capital rise more quickly than the overall economy and taxes on capital remain low, a vicious circle of ever-growing dynastic wealth and growing concentration of wealth takes place. However, the rise in the inequality of personal income distribution cannot only be explained by the rise of capital incomes. An analysis of the generation of personal incomes, and consequently of inequality, requires a suitable framework that links incomes at the macroeconomic level (national accounts) and incomes at the level of the individual/household. It is possible to set up this framework starting from individual endowments and their link to the productive structure: that is to what can be called the “generating function of personal income.” This function transforms personal endowments into personal earnings, given the productive structure, the technologies, and the market rules that determine the functional distribution. Personal income distribution and its inequality are linked to the functional one through the shares of capital and labor owned by each individual. The framework introduced here seems to be a suitable tool to account for the fact that personal income distribution is inextricably tied up to different sources of inequality in the distribution of national income. Sources come from institutional and productive structures (matrix Y), but also from the distribution of endowments and of individual/household entitlements (matrix S). This approach, we argue, allows for the assessment and evaluation of the effects of “ambitious new policies,” aimed at reducing poverty and inequality ex-ante, as suggested by Atkinson in his last book.
机译：本文的目的是提出一个将职能和个人收入分配联系起来的框架。在本文的第一部分中，简要回顾了Piketty的书“二十一世纪的资本”。讨论了Piketty的框架，认为它只能部分解释个人收入分配的水平和变化。 Piketty以非常创新的方式将资本r的回报与国民收入g的增长率联系起来，在宏观经济框架内进行比较。他声称，当资本收益的增长快于整体经济的增长，并且资本税仍然很低时，王朝财富不断增长且财富日益集中的恶性循环就会发生。但是，个人收入分配不平等的加剧不仅可以用资本收入的增加来解释。对个人收入的产生以及不平等的结果进行分析，需要一个合适的框架，该框架将宏观经济水平（国民账户）的收入与个人/家庭水平的收入联系起来。可以从个人end赋及其与生产结构的联系开始建立该框架：也就是所谓的“个人收入的产生功能”。给定确定功能分配的生产结构，技术和市场规则，此功能将个人捐赠转化为个人收入。个人收入分配及其不平等是通过每个人拥有的资本和劳动力的份额与职能部门联系起来的。这里介绍的框架似乎是一个适当的工具，可以用来说明以下事实：个人收入分配与国民收入分配中不平等的不同根源密不可分。来源来自体制和生产结构（矩阵Y），也来自of赋和个人/家庭权利的分配（矩阵S）。我们认为，这种方法允许对“雄心勃勃的新政策”的效果进行评估和评估，正如阿特金森在上一本书中所建议的那样，其目的是事前减少贫困和不平等。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号