• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Academic Ethics >Severity of Types of Violations of Research Ethics: Perception of Iranian Master's Students of Translation
【24h】

Severity of Types of Violations of Research Ethics: Perception of Iranian Master's Students of Translation

机译：违反研究伦理的严重程度：对伊朗硕士翻译学生的看法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Violations of research ethics including a varieties of plagiarism by students in Iran is a concern which has lately called promising levels of attention as rules are updated and better enforced and more awareness is being raised. As to deal with any problem, a full understanding of its nature is necessary, the current study focused on how a sample of Iranian students construe this phenomenon. To collect the necessary data, an original questionnaire with 34 closed-ended items included the most common instances of violations of research ethics was designed. The items included were mainly varieties of plagiarism identified in the literature. The items were narrowed down with reference to the qualitative data from focus group interviews with a purposive sample of Iranian graduate students. In the main phase of the study, using the questionnaire, quantitative data were obtained from the responses of 274 graduate students of translation studying in various Iranian universities. The findings revealed the participants did not have a fully accurate perception and appreciation of research ethics violation as they failed to distinguish ethically acceptable from unethical conducts. The contributing sample showed indifference to most ethical issues in scholarly publication. Translating a text and presenting it as one's own in addition to text recycling were identified as the most severe instances perceived. The types, fraudulence, unacknowledged use, duplicate publication, misreferencing, excessive overuse were perceived the most severe to the least severe according to the sample. The typology and the findings on the severity of the types and instances were recommended to be used as an empirically supported guideline for curriculum design of academic writing courses in graduate programs in Iranian universities or similar contexts.
机译：伊朗的学生违反了研究道德规范，包括各种窃，这是一个令人担忧的问题，近来，随着规则的更新和更好地执行以及人们的意识提高，人们对注意力的关注程度令人鼓舞。至于处理任何问题，必须全面了解其性质，当前的研究重点是如何从伊朗学生的样本中了解这一现象。为了收集必要的数据，设计了包含34个不限项目的原始问卷，其中包括最常见的违反研究道德的情况。所包括的项目主要是文献中发现的窃品种。参照焦点小组访谈的定性数据和针对性的伊朗研究生样本，缩小了项目范围。在研究的主要阶段，使用调查表从伊朗各大学的274名翻译研究生中获得了定量数据。调查结果表明，参与者没有完全正确地理解和理解研究伦理违规，因为他们没有将伦理可接受的行为与不道德的行为区分开。贡献的样本显示出对学术出版物中大多数道德问题的冷漠。翻译文本并将其呈现为自己的文本，再加上文本回收，被认为是感知到的最严重的实例。根据样本，类型，欺诈，未经确认的使用，重复的出版物，错误的引用，过度的过度使用被认为是最严重或最不严重的。建议将类型学和有关类型和实例严重性的发现用作伊朗大学或类似情况下研究生课程学术写作课程课程设计的经验支持指南。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号