• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Building Survey, Appraisal & Valuation >The Party Wall Act and boundary disputes: An uneasy and often costly co-existence
【24h】

The Party Wall Act and boundary disputes: An uneasy and often costly co-existence

机译：《政党墙法案》与边界争端：不安且通常代价高昂的共存

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Every day, up and down the country there are a large number of party wall cases that require resolving. There are, however, a Jew cases among them that, due to historical disagreements between neighbours, mean that the adjoining owners may not want party wall works to proceed. Boundary dispute claims often prevent such developments from taking place in the first place. If, prima facie, such instances are treated with some credence, with injunctive actions to follow, the county courts are inundated with such cases and may not be able to deal with them swiftly. In boundary disputes, building owners may be faced with long delays, However, in the event of adjoining owners wishing to sell their properties in future, obligation for disclosure of boundary disputes would. It is essential that when boundary disputes are made, the disputes are considered alongside the party wall process and ideally outside the ambit of the courts, perhaps through expert mediation to evaluate the validity of the allegations made and rectify the misunderstandings. This paper analyses a boundary dispute in which no amount of diplomacy could deter a disgruntled adjoining owner from stopping the building process by declaring that administration of the party wall process was null and void until the disputed boundary matter has first been resolved.
机译：每天在全国上下，都有大量需要解决的政党隔离墙案件。但是，其中有一个犹太人的案例，由于邻居之间的历史分歧，这意味着毗邻的业主可能不希望进行党的围墙工程。边界争端主张通常首先阻止这种事态发展。如果从表面上看，这些案件得到一定程度的信任，并应采取禁制措施，则县法院将被此类案件淹没，并且可能无法迅速处理。在边界纠纷中，建筑物所有者可能会面临很长的延迟，但是，如果相邻的所有者希望将来出售其财产，则将有披露边界纠纷的义务。至关重要的是，在进行边界争端时，可能要通过专家调解来评估所提指控的有效性并纠正误解，同时将争端与政党隔离程序一起考虑，最好是在法院的管辖范围之外。本文分析了一个边界争端，在这种争端中，没有任何外交手段可以阻止心怀不满的毗邻所有者停止建筑过程，方法是宣布直到解决有争议的边界问题之前，对政党隔离墙的管理都是无效的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号