• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Crime and Justice >The general responsivity principle in community supervision: the importance of probation officers using cognitive intervention techniques and its influence on recidivism
【24h】

The general responsivity principle in community supervision: the importance of probation officers using cognitive intervention techniques and its influence on recidivism

机译：社区监督中的一般责任原则：缓刑官员使用认知干预技术的重要性及其对累犯的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The present study examines the General Responsivity Principle of the Risk-Need-Responsivity model of offender assessment and treatment which holds that employing cognitive social learning methods to influence the behavior of offenders is the most effective approach to reduce recidivism. In this study, the prevalence rates of probation officers discussing procriminal attitudes and their use of cognitive intervention strategies during one-on-one supervision sessions with their clients was assessed and the impact of these discussions and strategies on reoffending was examined. Audio-recorded supervision sessions from officers engaging in routine practice as well as from officers who were trained in the Strategic Training Initiative in Community Supervision (STICS) model were rated. Results indicated that without this training, officers infrequently (i.e., approximately 5% of the recorded sessions) discussed procriminal attitudes/cognitions and rarely used cognitive intervention techniques with their clients (i.e., approximately 1% of sessions). Officers who were STICS trained showed significant improvement in talking about attitudes and using cognitive intervention techniques (i.e., 39 and 42% of sessions, respectively). Cox regression survival analysis found the use of cognitive intervention techniques was significantly related to lower rates of reoffending. These findings support the General Responsivity Principle within the context of one-on-one community supervision.View full textDownload full textKeywordsprobation, intervention techniques, cognitive-behavioral, responsivityRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2012.674816
机译：本研究探讨了罪犯评估与治疗的风险-需要-责任感模型的一般责任原理，该模型认为采用认知社会学习方法来影响罪犯的行为是减少累犯的最有效方法。在这项研究中，评估了与他们的客户进行一对一监督会议期间，缓刑官员讨论诉讼态度的患病率以及他们对认知干预策略的使用，并研究了这些讨论和策略对再犯的影响。对参加日常活动的官员以及接受过社区监督战略培训计划（STICS）模式培训的官员进行的录音监督会议进行了评分。结果表明，没有经过这种培训，警官很少（即大约记录的会议的5％）讨论举动的态度/认知，很少与客户（即大约1％的会议）使用认知干预技术。经过STICS培训的军官在谈论态度和使用认知干预技术方面表现出了显着的进步（即分别占39％和42％）。 Cox回归生存分析发现，认知干预技术的使用与降低再犯率显着相关。这些发现在一对一社区监督的背景下支持了总响应原则。查看全文下载全文关键词修饰，干预技术，认知行为，响应性，netvibes，twitter，technorati，可口，linkedin，facebook，stumbleupon，digg，google，更多”，发布：“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2012.674816

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号