...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Economic Education >What Should We Be Teaching in Basic Economics Courses?
【24h】

What Should We Be Teaching in Basic Economics Courses?

机译：我们应该在基础经济学课程中教什么？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Advanced Placement economics leaves thousands of high school students with a misleading impression of modern economics. The courses fail to cover key sources of growth and prosperity, including private ownership, dynamic competition, and entrepreneurship. The tools of public choice economics are totally ignored. Government is modeled as a corrective device available to impose ideal solutions. Market failure is covered, but there is no such thing as government failure. The macroeconomics course reflects the simplistic 1960s Keynesian view of stabilization policy. Time lags, incentive effects, secondary effects of budget deficits, and other factors that complicate effective use of stabilization policy are almost entirely ignored. In contrast, the 20 Voluntary National Content Standards in Economics of the Council for Economic Education illustrate what a balanced course in modern economics would look like.
机译：高级进修经济学使成千上万的高中生对现代经济学产生了误导性印象。这些课程未能涵盖增长和繁荣的关键来源，包括私有制，动态竞争和企业家精神。公共选择经济学的工具被完全忽略了。政府被建模为可施加理想解决方案的纠正工具。市场失灵得到了弥补，但没有政府失灵之类的东西。宏观经济学课程反映了1960年代凯恩斯主义对稳定政策的简单化看法。时滞，激励作用，预算赤字的次要影响以及使稳定政策的有效使用复杂化的其他因素几乎被完全忽略。相比之下，经济教育委员会制定的《经济学的20项国家自愿性国家内容标准》说明了现代经济学中均衡的发展方向。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号