• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of engineering education >Systematic literature review of persistence of engineering transfer students
【24h】

Systematic literature review of persistence of engineering transfer students

机译：持久性工程转移学生的系统文献综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background Increasing the number of engineering graduates continues to be a national priority and influences the need to understand persistence of all student pathways. Few studies have focused on engineering transfer student pathways and their success post-transfer, suggesting a need for a more comprehensive analysis of existing research to advance this area. Purpose A comprehensive literature review was conducted to identify the factors found in the literature that most significantly affect engineering transfer student persistence, discuss themes that span the factors, and identify the frameworks used in the literature to understand engineering transfer student persistence. Scope/Method A systematic literature review method was used to capture a broad range of publications. A thematic synthesis approach was used to analyze the results of the final publication set. Results The systematic review identified 76 publications in this research area, and analysis of these publications resulted in 33 unique factors and 3 overarching themes. Additionally, 13 persistence frameworks were identified as being used to understand engineering transfer student persistence. Conclusions Findings from this work suggest that the primary methods institutions can use to increase persistence in engineering of this population are increasing pre-transfer academic requirements, increasing student integration, and providing an inclusive institutional culture. This review also supports the need for an updated persistence framework that considers the characteristics of engineering transfer students. Gaps in the literature were also identified and indicate a need to differentiate vertical and lateral transfer students as well as extend the review of post-transfer academics beyond the first post-transfer year.
机译：背景，增加工程毕业生的数量仍然是国家优先事项，并影响理解所有学生途径的持久性的必要性。很少有研究专注于工程转移学生途径及其成功后转移，这表明需要更全面地分析现有的研究，以推进这一领域。目的是进行全面的文学综述，以确定文献中发现的因素，这些因素最大地影响工程转移学生持久性，讨论跨越因素的主题，并确定文献中使用的框架，了解工程转移学生持久性。范围/方法通过系统文献综述方法来捕获广泛的出版物。主题合成方法用于分析最终出版物集的结果。结果系统评价确定了该研究领域的76个出版物，对这些出版物的分析导致了33个独特因素和3个总体主题。此外，13个持久性框架被确定为用于了解工程转移学生持久性。结论这项工作的调查结果表明，主要方法机构可以利用增加该人口工程的持久性正在提高转运前学术要求，增加学生一体化，并提供包容性制度文化。此审查还支持需要更新的持久性框架，其考虑工程转移学生的特征。还确定了文学中的差距，并表明需要区分垂直和横向转移学生，并在第一次转移后一年中延长转移后学者的审查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号