...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of environmental studies and sciences >Quantitative reasoning in introductory environmental science textbooks
【24h】

Quantitative reasoning in introductory environmental science textbooks

机译:环境科学入门教材中的定量推理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Environmental science courses often are taken by nonscience majors to fulfill core undergraduate requirements. Because of this, these courses should provide students with the necessary skills used to interpret quantitative information from graphs. In this study, 10 environmental science textbooks were evaluated based on their incorporation of quantitative visuals. The mean graph density for the 10 textbooks was 0.22 figures per page. Across the 10 textbooks in the sample, the density of quantitative visuals ranged from 0.069 to 0.41 graphs per page. The type of graph that was represented most frequently was line (54%) followed by bar (29%), pie (12%), scatter (4%), and combination (1%). Other factors were taken into consideration, such as presence of error bars and a graph-interpreting supplemental section. Fifty percent of the textbooks contained at least one graph with error bars, and 30% of textbooks had at least one section dedicated to building graph comprehension. The wide variation in figure densities indicates that there are opportunities to expand the use of quantitative visuals in future editions of introductory environmental science textbooks when current editions have comparatively low figure densities.
机译:非科学专业通常会选修环境科学课程,以满足本科生的核心要求。因此,这些课程应为学生提供必要的技能,用于解释图形中的定量信息。在这项研究中,基于10种环境科学教科书的定量视觉效果,对其进行了评估。 10本教科书的平均图形密度为每页0.22个图形。在样本中的10本教科书中,定量视觉效果的密度范围为每页0.069至0.41张图形。最常显示的图表类型是线(54%),其次是条形(29%),饼图(12%),散点图(4%)和组合(1%)。还考虑了其​​他因素,例如是否存在误差线和图形解释补充部分。 50%的教科书包含至少一个带有误差线的图形,而30%的教科书至少具有一个用于构建图形理解的部分。图密度的广泛差异表明,当当前版本的环境密度相对较低时,在未来版本的环境科学入门教科书中有机会扩大定量视觉的使用范围。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号