首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Human Rights >Ethical Advice: Conflict Management vs. Human Rights in Ending Civil Wars
【24h】

Ethical Advice: Conflict Management vs. Human Rights in Ending Civil Wars

机译:道德建议:结束内战中的冲突管理与人权

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The theory of transitional justice, usually either war crimes tribunals and/or truth commissions, rests on the assumption that after internal conflict, societies must learn and accept the truth of what sort of violence has occurred in order to build a functioning, united society, and that any solution which omits such policies should be rejected. There is no empirical support for this assumption. Moreover, acting on it implies that civil war should be continued. Conflict resolution theory asserts that all major players, including those who have committed atrocities, must be involved in the settlement if it is to be stable. This seems a more appropriate strategy, especially when dealing with someone else's country and war.
机译:过渡司法理论,通常是战争罪行法庭和/或真相委员会,是基于这样的假设:在内部冲突之后,社会必须学习并接受发生了何种暴力的真相,以建立一个运转正常的团结社会,并应拒绝任何忽略此类政策的解决方案。该假设没有经验支持。此外,对此采取行动意味着内战应继续下去。解决冲突理论认为,要想稳定,所有主要参与者,包括犯下暴行的人,都必须参与解决。这似乎是一个更合适的策略,尤其是在与他人的国家和战争打交道时。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Human Rights》 |2008年第4期|376-387|共12页
  • 作者

    Roy Licklider;

  • 作者单位

    Rutgers University,;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号