• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of internet law >SECONDARY LIABILITY FOR INDUCING COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT AFTER MGM V. GROKSTER: INFRINGEMENT-PREVENTION AND PRODUCT DESIGN
【24h】

SECONDARY LIABILITY FOR INDUCING COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT AFTER MGM V. GROKSTER: INFRINGEMENT-PREVENTION AND PRODUCT DESIGN

机译：MGM V. GROKSTER之后引发版权侵权的次要责任：侵权预防和产品设计

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Earlier this year, the United States Supreme Court handed down its decision in MGM Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd., a case addressing the scope of secondary liability for copyright infringement in the context of peer-to-peer file sharing software. Particularly due to the increasing prevalence of digital technologies, and their impact on the copying, use, and transmission of copyrighted works, the decision was eagerly anticipated not only by copyright holders, but also by creators and distributors of new products that potentially could be used by consumers for infringing purposes. The parties and a multitude of amid curiae asked the Court to decide and clarify many important issues, including the application, in the digital era, of the Court's 1984 decision in Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc., which held Sony was not secondarily liable for the infringing uses consumers made of its Betamax videocassette recorder.
机译：今年早些时候，美国最高法院在MGM Studios Inc.诉Grokster，Ltd.一案中下达了该判决，该案涉及在点对点文件共享软件的背景下版权侵权的次要责任范围。特别是由于数字技术的日益普及及其对版权作品的复制，使用和传输的影响，不仅版权持有人，而且还有可能使用新产品的创造者和发行者都迫切希望做出这一决定。被消费者用于侵权目的。各方和众多争议者要求法院裁决和澄清许多重要问题，包括在数字时代对法院1984年在Sony Corp. of America v。Universal City Studios，Inc.案中的判决的适用。对于消费者对其Betamax盒式磁带录像机制造的侵权使用，索尼不承担第二责任。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号