...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>无_Journal of Management & Organization >Self-employment: Deviation or the norm?
【24h】

Self-employment: Deviation or the norm?

机译：自营职业：偏离还是规范？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In many countries self-employment has increased recently. But, despite evidence that many people enter self-employment willingly out of choice, there appears to be an instinctive aversion to it, possibly based on an assumption that employment is more desirable and beneficial and is, and should be, the norm. Often using a UK viewpoint, this paper examines the history of work and suggests that, in historical terms, employment is the exception not the norm. The age of the job, it is claimed, lasted only from 1840 to 1980, but its influence continues and many government regulations and union practices are still based on the era of the big business, big labour and big government triumvirate. Therefore, if the future is not to be constrained by laws and practices designed for the past, it is important to identify the perceptions and assumptions which prevail about employment and to highlight those which are incorrect.
机译：在许多国家，自营职业最近有所增加。但是，尽管有证据表明许多人会自愿地选择不择业，但似乎有一种本能的反感，这可能是基于这样一种假设，即就业是更理想和有益的，而且现在应该是规范。本文经常使用英国的观点，考察工作的历史，并建议从历史角度来看，就业是例外，而非常规。据称，工作年龄仅持续到1840年至1980年，但它的影响力仍在继续，许多政府法规和工会惯例仍以大企业，大劳力和大政府重生的时代为基础。因此，如果未来不受制于过去制定的法律和惯例，则重要的是要确定对就业普遍存在的看法和假设，并强调那些不正确的观念和假设。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号