• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Mass Media Ethics: Exploring Questions of Media Morality >The Ethics Examiner and Media Councils: Improving Ombudsmanship and News Councils for True Citizen Journalism
【24h】

The Ethics Examiner and Media Councils: Improving Ombudsmanship and News Councils for True Citizen Journalism

机译：道德审查员和媒体委员会：改善公民新闻业的监察员和新闻委员会

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The debate over news ombudsmen remains at a seemingly irreconcilable impasse, and less relevant as journalism shifts away from print and traditional newsroom structures in the new-media age. There are fewer than 30 ombudsmen at U.S. media outlets today, according to the Organization of News Ombudsmen (Ombudsmen, 2010). We argue that the greatest failure of ombudsmanship is that it does not go far enough in giving voice and visibility to the ombudsman's work, including interacting with community. Media news outlets can best serve the public trust by fulfilling the journalistic mission of civic transformation through empowerment advocated by Christians, Ferre, and Fackler (1993). As the vanguard of the communitarian approach of “person-in-community,” the ideal ombudsman would be just that: a person in the community. The ethical goal of ombudsmanship should be not to promote an apologist from within the ranks but rather to facilitate a community conversation. We propose integrating the ideal ombudsman (which we redefine and rename as the ethics examiner) with the best practices of successful news councils (hereafter called media councils in a return to their original name and to encompass a broader universe of information outlets).View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08900523.2011.525188
机译：关于新闻监察员的辩论似乎仍处于无法调和的僵局，随着新媒体时代新闻业从印刷和传统新闻编辑室结构的转变而变得无关紧要。根据新闻监察员组织（Ombudsmen，2010）的数据，当今美国媒体的监察员人数不到30。我们认为，监察员制度的最大失败在于，它不能为监察员的工作（包括与社区互动）提供声音和可见性。媒体新闻媒体可以通过基督徒，费雷和法克勒（1993）倡导的赋权来履行公民转型的新闻使命，从而最好地服务于公众的信任。作为“社区中的人”社区主义方法的先锋，理想的监察员将是：社区中的一个人。监察员的道德目标不应是从内部晋升辩护律师，而应促进社区对话。我们建议将理想的申诉专员（我们将其重新定义并重命名为道德审查员）与成功的新闻理事会（以下简称媒体理事会）的最佳做法相结合，以恢复其原始名称并涵盖更广泛的信息渠道。全文下载相关文章，请参见var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand：“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”，service_compact：“ citeulike，netvibes，twitter，technorati，delicious，linkedin，facebook，stumbleupon，digg，google，更多”，发布日期：“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”} ;添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08900523.2011.525188

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号