...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of multicultural discourses >Studying ideology and discourse as knowledge, power and material practices
【24h】

Studying ideology and discourse as knowledge, power and material practices

机译：将思想和话语研究为知识，权力和材料实践

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The notion of ideology plays a crucial role in the social sciences in general and discourse studies in particular because it helps us conceptualize, problematize and understand the complex relationship between language use and power structures. In this respect, ideology analysis contributes to a holistic, multilevel and complex understanding of discourse (Shi-xu 2014). The research programs of social scientific approaches to ideology and the still emerging field of discourse studies show several similarities and parallel developments. For both programs, knowledge and power, symbolic realities and their material mediation, as well as the practical production and consequences of knowledge and belief systems are at the very center of interest. During the last century researchers in both fields crossed their way, engaging in debates that enriched the understanding of ideology as a phenomenon as well as of discourse research. It could even be argued that discourse studies were founded on the shoulders of the giants of ideology research. Francis Bacon's analysis of idola, left Hegelian critique on religion and inverted consciousness from Marx, to Lukacs, and Gramsci's notion of hegemony have been highly influential when the linguistic turn in social sciences and humanities lead the research agenda to the specific influence of language for the construction of social perception. Here the work of Louis Althusser has to be mentioned. His theory of ideology can be seen as hinge between Marxist notions of ideology and discourse studies. His focus on ideology as representation of an imaginary relationship and a material reality, or the conceptualization of the constitution of subjects through the semiotic practice of interpellation can be understood as a starting point for the arising multidisciplinary research program of critical discourse studies. Finally, Foucault's work on discourse, power and subjectivation has inspired contemporary scholars analysing knowledge as a political tool that is forming people's identities (Foucault 1980). Important inputs came also from Fairclough's work on the relation of ideology and power (1989) as well as from Laclau and Mouffe's (1985) radical stance on hegemony and towards the discursive foundations of realities.
机译：意识形态的概念在社会科学中对一般和话语研究起到了至关重要的作用，特别是因为它有助于我们概念化，解决和理解语言使用与功率结构之间的复杂关系。在这方面，意识形态分析有助于整体，多级和对话语的复杂理解（Shi-xu 2014）。意识形态社会科学途径研究课程及仍然新兴领域的话语研究表明了几种相似之处和平行发展。对于方案，知识和权力，象征性的现实及其材料调解，以及知识和信仰系统的实际生产和后果在非常感兴趣的中心。在上个世纪，这两个领域的研究人员越过了他们的方式，从事辩论，以丰富对意识形态的理解作为一种现象以及话语研究。甚至可以说，话语研究成立于意识形态研究巨头的肩膀上。弗朗西斯培根对偶像岛的分析，从马克思向卢克斯留给宗教和抗逆意识的宗教和倒置意识，克拉姆奇的霸权概念在社会科学和人文学科的语言转向领导着对语言的特定影响的研究议程产生了高度影响力建设社会认知。在这里必须提到路易斯阿尔瑟斯的工作。他的意识形态理论可以看作是Marxist思想概念与话语研究之间的铰链。他对思想的关注作为虚构关系和物质现实的代表，或者通过符号外插口符号实践的主体构成的概念化可以被理解为批判性话语研究的多学科研究计划的起点。最后，福柯关于话语，权力和主观的工作启发了当代学者，分析知识作为形成人民身份的政治工具（Foucault 1980）。重要的投入也来自FairClough关于思想和权力的关系（1989年）以及哈格劳和Mouffe（1985）在霸权的激进立场以及走向现实的话语基础。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of multicultural discourses》 |2021年第2期|103-106|共4页
  • 作者

    Johannes Beetz; Benno Herzog; Jens Maesse;

  • 作者单位

    Centre for Applied Linguistics University of Warwick Coventry UK;

    Department of Sociology and Social Anthropology University of Valencia Valencia Spain;

    Institute of Sociology University of Giessen Giessen Germany;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号