首页> 外文期刊>Journal of organizational behavior management >A Comparison of Two Data Analysis Training Methods for Paraprofessionals in an Educational Setting
【24h】

A Comparison of Two Data Analysis Training Methods for Paraprofessionals in an Educational Setting

机译:教育环境中两种针对专业人员的数据分析培训方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Analyzing and using student educational data to guide instructional programming is a critical staff skill to ensure quality programming based on applied behavior analysis. We compared two training methods to teach staff to use rules to analyze graphed educational data to enact program changes: didactic instruction and behavioral skills training using direct practice. Participants showed improvements in verbally identifying data patterns using simulated data; however, participants in the latter group were also effective using actual student data. The lack of correspondence between rule identification and rule following challenges the assumption that an individual's ability to identify rules predicts actual performance.
机译:分析和使用学生教育数据来指导教学计划是一项至关重要的员工技能,以确保基于应用行为分析的高质量计划。我们比较了两种培训方法来教职员使用规则来分析图形化的教育数据来制定程序更改:教学指导和使用直接练习的行为技能培训。参与者展示了使用模拟数据在口头识别数据模式方面的改进;但是,后一组的参与者使用实际的学生数据也很有效。规则识别与规则遵循之间缺乏对应性,这挑战了以下假设:个人识别规则的能力可以预测实际绩效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号