• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of political power >International ideas versus national traditions: Nordic economic and public policy as proposed by the OECD
【24h】

International ideas versus national traditions: Nordic economic and public policy as proposed by the OECD

机译：国际观念与国家传统：经合组织提议的北欧经济和公共政策

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Through analysis of the Organisation for Economic Co-ordination and Development (OECD)'s recommendations to reform Nordic public and economic policy, this article seeks to assess the OECD's influence on Nordic politics. OECD recommendations are placed at the juncture of internationally acknowledged ideas and national traditions - thus being potentially useful for national policy-makers trying to deal with this tension. During the post-war period the Nordic countries found an original combination of international ideas and national traditions, involving a combination of economic efficiency and social equality. The OECD acknowledges this tradition in various ways but seeks to reform Nordic public policy according to a different, and in many ways opposing logic. OECD recommendations for Nordic countries typically include lower income taxes, lower levels of social security benefits, individual level wage setting, more relaxed employment protection legislation, an increase of the labour supply and a balanced budget. In spite of existing evidence of regime stability, it is not possible to exclude OECD influence on Nordic public and economic policy as past reforms correspond in many ways to these recommendations. This, in turn, raises the question of the democratic legitimacy of the way in which reforms are prepared.
机译：通过分析经济合作与发展组织（OECD）关于改革北欧公共和经济政策的建议，本文旨在评估OECD对北欧政治的影响。经合发组织的建议被置于国际公认的思想和民族传统的交汇处，因此对试图应对这种紧张局势的国家决策者而言可能是有用的。在战后时期，北欧国家发现了国际思想与民族传统的原始结合，涉及经济效率与社会平等的结合。经合组织以各种方式承认这一传统，但力图以不同的，相反的逻辑来改革北欧的公共政策。经合组织对北欧国家的建议通常包括降低所得税，降低社会保障福利水平，确定个人水平的工资水平，更加宽松的就业保护立法，增加劳动力供应和平衡预算。尽管已有政权稳定的证据，但不可能排除经合组织对北欧公共和经济政策的影响，因为过去的改革在许多方面都与这些建议相对应。反过来，这就提出了改革准备方式的民主合法性的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号