首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Progressive Human Services >Welfare Words: Critical Social Work and Social Policy
【24h】

Welfare Words: Critical Social Work and Social Policy

机译:福利词:批判性社会工作和社会政策

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The present conjuncture is overwhelmed by conflicting claims about need, help, and who is to blame, and oftentimes, divergent claims are constructed using the same vocabulary. Paul Michael Garrett's Welfare Words: Critical Social Work and Social Policy intervenes in the disconcerting fact of shared vocabularies through a recursive return to the British Cultural Studies scholar Raymond Williams' (1983/1976) Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. Thinking along with Sanford Schram (p. 208), Garrett shifts the terminology from 'keywords' to 'welfare words,' and defines "welfare words as those words and phrases used by 'primary definers' (Hall et al., 1978) to steer debates on welfare in favour of a neoliberal political, economic and cultural agenda" (p. 12). "Attentiveness to such words is of the utmost importance" he argues, "because they can reflect how the dominant order is assembled; they contribute to its constitution and consolidation but, on occasions, they can also become the focus of challenges to the status quo" (p. 207). Attention to welfare words can assist social work to "think and speak against the grain ... to revive and foreground alternative and more oppositional keywords ..." (p. 209). For example, Garrett discusses the disciplining valorization of 'care' in contexts of workplace restructuring and violence to illustrate the ways in which keywords foundational to social work identity and practice are used to both distract from and justify ongoing neoliberal reconfigurations of social welfare.
机译:关于需求,帮助和应归咎于人的说法相互矛盾,使目前的状况变得不堪重负,而且常常使用相同的词汇来构成不同的主张。保罗·迈克尔·加勒特(Paul Michael Garrett)的《福利用语:批判性的社会工作和社会政策》通过递归返回英国文化研究学者雷蒙德·威廉姆斯(Raymond Williams)(1983/1976)的关键词:共享词汇的令人不安的事实进行干预。关键词:文化与社会的词汇。加勒特与桑福德·施拉姆(Sanford Schram,p。208)一起思考,将术语从“关键词”转变为“福利词”,并将“福利词定义为”主要定义者”使用的那些词和短语(Hall等,1978)。引导有关福利的辩论,以支持新自由主义的政治,经济和文化议程”(第12页)。他认为:“对这些词语的关注至关重要,因为它们可以反映出统治秩序的组装方式;它们有助于其秩序的巩固和巩固,但有时它们也可能成为挑战现状的焦点” ”(第207页)。注意福利用语可以帮助社会工作“思考和反对谷物……复兴和发展替代和更多对立的关键词……”(第209页)。例如,加勒特(Garrett)在工作场所重组和暴力的背景下讨论了“照料”的门槛价位,以说明使用基于社会工作身份和实践的关键字来分散和证明正在进行的新自由主义社会福利重构的方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号