• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Public Policy >Regulatory Impact Assessment: Formal Institutionalization and Practice
【24h】

Regulatory Impact Assessment: Formal Institutionalization and Practice

机译：监管影响评估：正式的制度化和实践

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In the last decade regulatory reforms have focused increasingly on efforts to improve regulatory quality. As part of that development policymakers have been encouraged to consider fiscal, socio-economic and administrative effects of proposed legislation when making policy choices. The Central and East European EU member states have adopted regulatory impact analysis (RIA) mechanisms but so far there has been little analysis of their implementation. This article first compares the manner in which RIAs have been institutionalised in the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Slovakia and Slovenia. Second, it explores how differences in institutionalisation have affected RIA performance. The paper concludes that there are marked differences in the RIA quality across Central and Eastern Europe, notably as a consequence of national differences in institutional and administrative contexts and capacities.
机译：在过去的十年中，监管改革越来越侧重于提高监管质量的工作。作为发展的一部分，鼓励政策制定者在做出政策选择时考虑拟议立法的财政，社会经济和行政影响。中欧和东欧欧盟成员国已采用监管影响分析（RIA）机制，但到目前为止，对其执行情况的分析很少。本文首先比较了在捷克共和国，爱沙尼亚，匈牙利，斯洛伐克和斯洛文尼亚将RIA制度化的方式。其次，它探讨了制度化上的差异如何影响RIA的绩效。本文的结论是，中欧和东欧的RIA质量存在明显差异，这主要是由于机构和行政环境以及能力方面的国家差异所致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号