• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of technology transfer >A micro level study of university industry collaborative lifecycle key performance indicators
【24h】

A micro level study of university industry collaborative lifecycle key performance indicators

机译：大学行业协同生命周期关键绩效指标的微观研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The assessment of university-industry collaborative projects has been complex and has become more prevalent in national research, educational and innovation system reviews. One criticism made about studies of university-industry collaboration (UIC) is they are too much orientated towards exclusively the outputs (Rossi and Rosli in Stud High Educ 40(10):1970-1991, 2015) and that there is a need to apply case specific metrics. To address this criticism we have taken Brown et al's Res Technol Manag 31(4):11-15, (1988) R&D lifecycle of inputs, in-process activities, outputs and impact at micro level to examine what are the common and context specific key performance indicators of UIC. Taking a qualitative approach and using university-industry collaborative projects set in Finland and Russia our study identified a common set of micro level KPIs across the UIC lifecycle at a micro level. Namely, the amount of resources allocated by partners to collaboration; efficiency of collaboration management and clearly defined roles; as well as a number of company innovations resulting from collaboration with a university and new strategic partnerships. Our study also found contextual micro level KPIs as number of young researchers involved, fit between collaboration and organizational strategy; number of joint publications; enterprise image improvements. Our research extends the existing knowledge on UIC KPIs in the following ways. First, we define those KPIs, which are applicable by all the three actors of the triple helix, but also identify those that are not used by some of these actors. Second, we analyse the relevance of certain KPIs proposed by governmental bodies and the literature in terms of their applicability in the analysed case studies. Finally, we define those metrics, which among other existing KPIs depend on the case context (region, research area, industrial sector and partners' goals) as well as identify additional KPIs, which have not received attention in UIC literature.
机译：大学与产业合作项目的评估非常复杂，并且在国家研究，教育和创新体系审查中变得越来越普遍。对大学与产业合作（UIC）的研究提出的一种批评是，它们过于专注于产出（Rossi和Rosli在Stud High Educ 40（10）：1970-1991，2015）中，有必要应用特定于案例的指标。为了解决这一批评，我们采用了Brown等人的Res Technol Manag 31（4）：11-15，（1988）微观层面的投入，过程中活动，产出和影响的R＆D生命周期，研究了共同点和具体情况。 UIC的关键绩效指标。我们采用定性方法，并使用在芬兰和俄罗斯建立的大学与企业的合作项目，我们的研究在整个UIC生命周期的微观层次上确定了一套通用的微观KPI。即，伙伴分配给协作的资源量；协作管理的效率和明确定义的角色；与大学的合作以及新的战略合作伙伴关系带来的许多公司创新。我们的研究还发现，随着涉及的年轻研究人员数量的增加（在协作和组织策略之间适应），上下文微观KPI有所提高。联合出版物的数量；企业形象改善。我们的研究通过以下方式扩展了有关UIC KPI的现有知识。首先，我们定义了那些KPI，这些KPI适用于三重螺旋的所有三个参与者，而且还确定了其中一些参与者不使用的KPI。其次，我们根据分析案例研究中的适用性，分析了政府机构和文献提出的某些关键绩效指标的相关性。最后，我们定义了这些度量标准，这些度量标准取决于案例背景（区域，研究领域，工业部门和合作伙伴的目标）以及其他现有的KPI，并确定其他UI文献中未引起关注的KPI。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号