How should we (not) judge the 'quality' of qualitative research? A re-assessment of current evaluative criteria in International Business

Welch Catherine; Piekkari Rebecca

首页> 外文期刊>Journal of world business >How should we (not) judge the 'quality' of qualitative research? A re-assessment of current evaluative criteria in International Business

【24h】

How should we (not) judge the 'quality' of qualitative research? A re-assessment of current evaluative criteria in International Business

机译：我们应该如何（不应该）判断定性研究的“质量”？重新评估国际商务中当前的评估标准

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

In this paper, we initiate a debate about evaluative criteria (such as validity) which are - or should be - in use to assess the quality of qualitative manuscripts in International Business (IB). We identify three generations of evaluative criteria, each derived from different philosophical orientations. Based on an analysis of published articles in two IB journals, expert interviews and sample reviews, we show how these generations shape what the scholarly community considers to be "good" qualitative research. As an alternative to rigid application of a single set of quality procedures, we advocate a pluralist, contextual approach, reflecting the inherent characteristics of IB as a field.

机译：在本文中，我们引发了关于评估标准（例如有效性）的辩论，该评估标准已被或应被用于评估国际商务（IB）中定性手稿的质量。我们确定了三代评估标准，每一代均源自不同的哲学取向。基于对两种IB期刊中已发表文章的分析，专家访谈和样本评论，我们展示了这些世代如何塑造学术界认为是“良好”的定性研究。作为严格应用单个质量程序的替代方法，我们主张采用多元的，上下文相关的方法，以反映IB作为一个领域的固有特征。

著录项

来源
《Journal of world business》 |2017年第5期|714-725|共12页
作者
Welch Catherine; Piekkari Rebecca;
展开▼
作者单位

Univ Sydney, Business Sch, Discipline Int Business, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia;

Aalto Univ, Sch Business, Dept Management Studies, Runeberginkatu 14-16, FI-00100 Helsinki, Finland;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类
关键词
Qualitative research; Evaluative criteria; Assessment; Quality; Validity; Reviewing; Publishing;

机译：定性研究;评价标准;评估;质量;有效性;审查;出版;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Developing a framework of quality indicators for healthcare business cases: a qualitative document analysis consolidating insight from expert guidance and current practice [J] . Myles-Jay Linton, Joanna Coast, Iestyn Williams, BMC Health Services Research . 2019,第1期

机译：制定医疗保健业务案件质量指标的框架：一个定性文件分析，专家指导和目前的实践巩固了洞察力
2. THE MODEL FOR EVALUATING THE CRITERIA DESCRIBING THE QUALITY OF THE TRIP BY INTERNATIONAL TRAIN [J] . Lijana MASKELIūNAIT?, Henrikas SIVILEVI?IUS Technological and Economic Development of Economy . 2014,第3期

机译：用国际火车评估描述旅行质量的标准的模型
3. The model of evaluating the criteria, describing the quality of organization and technology of travel by international train [J] . Henrikas Sivilevi??ius, Kazys Petkevi??ius Transport . 2012,第3期

机译：评价标准的模型，描述国际火车旅行的组织和技术的质量
4. Evaluating the Quality of Business Process Models Based on Measures and Criteria in Higher Education: Developing a Framework for Continuous Quality Improvement [C] . Fouzia Kahloun, Sonia Ayachi Ghannouchi International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications . 2017

机译：评估基于高等教育措施和标准的业务流程模型的质量：制定持续质量改进的框架
5. CURRENT AND PREFERRED POLICIES IN THE SUPERVISION AND THE EVALUATION OF BUSINESS STUDENT-TEACHERS: AN ANALYSIS OF THE OPINIONS OF COLLEGIATE BUSINESS EDUCATION TEACHERS, COOPERATING HIGH SCHOOL BUSINESS TEACHERS, AND BUSINESS EDUCATION GRADUATES [D] . HIBLER, JOE ANNA. 1971

机译：工商管理师的监督和评估中的现行政策和优先政策：对大学商科教师，合作高等商科教师和商科毕业生的意见进行分析
6. Judging quality of current septic shock definitions and criteria [O] . Manu Shankar-Hari, Guido Bertolini, Frank M. Brunkhorst, 2015

机译：判断当前脓毒性休克定义和标准的质量
7. Judging quality of current septic shock definitions and criteria [O] . 2015

机译：判断当前脓毒性休克定义和标准的质量

How should we (not) judge the 'quality' of qualitative research? A re-assessment of current evaluative criteria in International Business

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅