...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of world energy law & business >Nuclear liability conventions and decommissioning: exclusion provisions revisited
【24h】

Nuclear liability conventions and decommissioning: exclusion provisions revisited

机译：核责任公约和退役：重新讨论排除条款

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Neither the Paris Convention on Nuclear Third Party Liability of 1960, nor the Vienna Convention on Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage of 1963 specifically addressed the issue of decommissioning nuclear installations in their provisions. The lack of explicit provisions concerning these activities in the liability conventions is due to the fact that, when these instruments were drafted, the development of nuclear energy was in its infancy, and there was little concern about activities at the back end of the fuel cycle. Since the 1980s, problems arose from the decommissioning of nuclear installations again raised questions concerning applicability of the liability regime of these liability conventions on various stages of decommissioning. Since the post-Chernobyl period, the issue of decommissioning was addressed in the Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management of 1997. Consequently, the Protocol to Amend the Vienna Convention on Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage in 1997 and in the Protocol to Amend the Paris Convention on Nuclear Third Party Liability of 2004 also raised the issue.
机译：1960年的《巴黎核第三方责任公约》和1963年的《维也纳关于核损害的民事责任公约》都没有在其规定中具体涉及退役核装置的问题。责任公约中没有关于这些活动的明确规定，是由于以下事实：在起草这些文书时，核能的发展还处于起步阶段，对燃料循环后期的活动几乎没有关注。自1980年代以来，核装置退役引起的问题再次引起人们对这些责任公约责任制度在退役各个阶段的适用性的质疑。自切尔诺贝利时代以来，退役问题在1997年的《乏燃料管理安全和放射性废物管理安全联合公约》中得到了解决。因此，《维也纳国际公约关于对造成核损害的民事责任进行修正的议定书》 1997年以及2004年的《关于修正巴黎第三方核责任公约的议定书》也提出了这个问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号