...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Knowledge Organization >Philosophical Foundations for the Organization of Religious Knowledge: Irreconcilable Diversity or a Unity of Purpose?
【24h】

Philosophical Foundations for the Organization of Religious Knowledge: Irreconcilable Diversity or a Unity of Purpose?

机译：宗教知识组织的哲学基础：不可调和的多样性或统一的目的？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

We examine the way in which religion is managed in the major library classification schemes and in archival practice and how and why bias and misrepresentation occur. Broad definitions of what is meant by diversity and religious pluralism and why it is a cause for concern precede a discussion of the standard model of interreligious attitudes (exclusivism/inclusivism/pluralism) with particular reference to the philosophy of John Hick. This model is used as a lens through which to evaluate knowledge organization systems (KOSs) for evidence of comparable theoretical positions and to suggest a possible typology of religious KOSs. Archival and library practice are considered, and, despite their very different approaches, found to have some similarities in the way in which traditional societal structures have affected bias and misrepresentation of religious beliefs. There is, nevertheless, evidence of a general move towards a more pluralistic attitude to different faiths.
机译：我们研究了在主要图书馆分类方案中和档案实践中管理宗教的方式以及如何以及为什么偏见和歪曲发生。通过多样性和宗教多元化的广泛定义以及为什么它是一个令人担忧的原因，前后讨论了违论态度（独家/包含期/多元化）的标准模型，特别是约翰·赫克的哲学。该模型用作镜头，以评估知识组织系统（KOSS）以获得可比的理论位置的证据，并表明宗教koss可能的类型。考虑了档案和图书馆实践，尽管采用了不同的方法，但发现传统社会结构影响了一些相似之处影响了宗教信仰的偏见和虚假陈述。然而，有一般迈向不同信仰的态度更加多元化的证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号