首页> 外文期刊>Minerva >Luigi Pellizzoni and Marja Yloenen (eds.), Neoliberalism and Technoscience: Critical Assessments
【24h】

Luigi Pellizzoni and Marja Yloenen (eds.), Neoliberalism and Technoscience: Critical Assessments

机译:Luigi Pellizzoni和Marja Yloenen(主编),新自由主义与技术科学:批判性评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Since the 1980s, the concepts of "neoliberalism" and "technoscience," although both of them were coined earlier, have almost simultaneously become rather prominent conceptual tools in various fields of social science research. The starting point of Neoliberalism and Technoscience: Critical Assessments, edited by Luigi Pellizzoni and Marja Ylonen, is the assumption that this temporal overlap is not just a coincidence and that it would be "quite surprising, then, to find no or merely casual connections between neoliberalization processes and technoscience" (2). There is already some work in science and technology studies (STS) and the sociology of science investigating the impact of neoliberalism on (techno-)science, frequently focusing on the management of scientific institutions; in addition, there are a number of studies, often inspired by Michel Foucault's work on biopolitics and governmentality, on the close relations of (techno-)science and neoliberalism in the field of biomedicine (see, for instance, Cooper 2008; Rouvroy 2008). Nevertheless, there have been no comprehensive analyses of the links between neoliberalism and technoscience which also consider other scientific and technological fields. In addition, the present volume is more ambitious than many other studies in that it not only looks at the influence of neoliberalism on technoscience, but also aims at exploring how technoscience contributes to the neoliberalization of society. Reflecting on these questions is very important, since they address the larger political contexts and implications of technoscience more explicitly than do most of the "micro-empiricist approaches" (as the editors term it in their introduction) which are common to STS.
机译:自1980年代以来,“新自由主义”和“技术科学”这两个概念虽然是较早提出的,但几乎同时已成为社会科学研究各个领域中相当重要的概念工具。由Luigi Pellizzoni和Marja Ylonen编辑的《新自由主义与技术科学:批判性评估》的出发点是这样的假设,即这种时间上的重叠不仅仅是巧合,而且“如果发现两者之间没有或只是偶然的联系,那将是非常令人惊讶的”新自由化过程和技术科学”(2)。在科学技术研究(STS)和科学社会学中已经有一些研究新自由主义对(技术)科学的影响的工作,经常侧重于科学机构的管理。此外,还有很多研究是受米歇尔·福柯(Michel Foucault)关于生物政治和政府性的研究启发而来的,涉及生物医学领域中(技术)科学与新自由主义的紧密联系(例如,参见Cooper 2008; Rouvroy 2008)。 。然而,对新自由主义与技术科学之间的联系还没有进行全面的分析,而这些技术也考虑了其他科学技术领域。此外,与其他许多研究相比,当前的著作更具雄心,因为它不仅关注新自由主义对技术科学的影响,而且旨在探索技术科学如何为社会的新自由化做出贡献。反思这些问题非常重要,因为与大多数STS常见的“微观经验主义方法”(如编辑在介绍中所称)相比,它们更明确地解决了更大的政治背景和技术科学的影响。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Minerva》 |2015年第2期|193-198|共6页
  • 作者

    Peter Wehling;

  • 作者单位

    Fachbereich Gesellschaftswissenschaften, Institut fuer Soziologie, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universitaet, Theodor W. Adorno-Platz 6, 60323 Frankfurt am Main, Germany;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号