'Dynamic Collaboration' from Scientists' Eyes

Takashi EGAWA; Masayoshi KOBAYASHI; Kenji YAMANlSHI; Akira ARUTAKI; Junji NAMIKI

首页> 外文期刊>NEC Journal of Advanced Technology >'Dynamic Collaboration' from Scientists' Eyes

【24h】

'Dynamic Collaboration' from Scientists' Eyes

机译：科学家眼中的“动态协作”

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

Considering SCM (Supply Chain Management) as an example, we formulate 'Dynamic Collabora- tion,' NEC's business vision, as a concept of control theory. This enables us to build business relationships in more flexible manner. Control theory tells us that such deeds make a system unstable if the number of business partners is more than a few, but our experience tells us they do not. We believe that in the real world there are self-organizing processes under which lie dynamics to make structure, and that thanks to this dynamics, systems become simple enough to be stable. It is therefore more important for us to understand and to control the dynamics than merely to discuss surface architecture. Ubiquity is another important component for system stability. It enables us quick sense and reaction, thus suppressing internal system delays and contributing to stability. We believe this clearly shows that our future lies in ubiquitous computing, and therefore in Dynamic Collaboration.

机译：以SCM（供应链管理）为例，我们将NEC的业务愿景“动态协作”制定为控制理论的概念。这使我们能够以更灵活的方式建立业务关系。控制理论告诉我们，如果业务伙伴的数量超过几个，这种行为会使系统变得不稳定，但是我们的经验告诉我们，事实并非如此。我们相信，在现实世界中，存在着自我组织的过程，在这些过程中，人们依靠动态来构造结构，并且由于这种动态，系统变得简单到足以稳定。因此，对我们而言，理解和控制动力学比仅讨论表面架构更为重要。无处不在是系统稳定性的另一个重要组成部分。它使我们能够快速感知和做出反应，从而抑制了内部系统的延迟并有助于稳定性。我们相信，这清楚地表明，我们的未来在于无处不在的计算，因此也取决于动态协作。

著录项

来源
《NEC Journal of Advanced Technology》 |2004年第1期|p.17-26|共10页
作者
Takashi EGAWA; Masayoshi KOBAYASHI; Kenji YAMANlSHI; Akira ARUTAKI; Junji NAMIKI;
展开▼
作者单位

System Platforms Research Laboratories;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类通信;一般工业技术;
关键词
dynamic collaboration; control theory; self-organization;

机译：动态协作;控制理论;自组织;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. An Emerging View of Scientific Collaboration: Scientists' Perspectives on Collaboration and Factors that Impact Collaboration [J] . Noriko Hara, Paul Solomon, Seung-Lye Kim, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology . 2003,第10期

机译：科学协作的新兴观点：科学家对协作的看法以及影响协作的因素
2. Advanced Management Research and the Mexican Rice Borer: LSU AgCenter scientists in collaboration with scientists in Texas continue their battle to protect the sugarcane and rice crops from this invasive species. [J] . Louisiana Agriculture . 2010,第4期

机译：高级管理研究和墨西哥稻米er虫：LSU AgCenter科学家与德克萨斯州的科学家合作，继续为保护甘蔗和稻米作物免受这种入侵物种的侵害。
3. Is Collaboration Among Scientists Related to the Citation Impact of Papers Because Their Quality Increases With Collaboration? An Analysis Based on Data From F1000Prime and Normalized Citation Scores [J] . Lutz Bornmann Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology . 2017,第4期

机译：科学家之间的合作是否与论文的引文影响有关，因为论文的质量会随着合作而提高？基于F1000Prime数据和归一化引文得分的分析
4. Understanding data through collaboration: Developing collaboration support tools for expert artists and scientists [C] . Keefe Daniel F. International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems . 2014

机译：通过协作了解数据：为专家艺术家和科学家开发协作支持工具
5. Collaboration, innovation and the building blocks of social capital in the technology sector: A comparative analysis of knowledge-creating institutions. The role of individual attributes, policies and environments in the collaboration and productivity of scientists and technologists. [D] . Avila Cobo, Salvador H. 2005

机译：技术部门的合作，创新和社会资本的构成要素：对知识创造机构的比较分析。个体属性，政策和环境在科学家和技术人员的协作和生产力中的作用。
6. A good collaboration is based on unique contributions from each side: assessing the dynamics of collaboration in stem cell science [O] . Michael Morrison 2017

机译：良好的合作基于双方的独特贡献：评估干细胞科学合作的动力
7. We develop a model of scientific creativity and test it in the field of rare diseases. Our model is based on the results of an in-depth case study of the Rett syndrome. Archival analysis, bibliometric techniques and expert surveys are combined with network analysis to identify the most creative scientists. First, alternative measures of generative and combinatorial creativity are compared. Then, we generalize our results and present a stochastic model of socio-semantic network evolution. The model predictions are tested with multiple networks of rare disease specialties. We find that new scientific collaborations among experts in a field enhance combinatorial creativity. Instead, high entry rates of novices are negatively related to generative creativity. By extending the set of useful concepts, creative scientists gain in centrality. At the same time, by increasing their centrality in the scientific community, scientists can replicate and generalize their results, thus contributing to a scientific paradigm. [O] . Massimo Riccaboni, Maria Laura Frigotto 100

机译：我们开发了一种科学创造力模型，并在稀有疾病领域进行测试。我们的模型基于对Rett综合征的深入案例研究的结果。档案分析，文献计量技术和专家调查与网络分析相结合，以确定最具创造力的科学家。首先，比较生成和组合创造力的替代措施。然后，我们推广了我们的结果，并提出了社会语义网络演化的随机模型。模型预测用多个罕见疾病专业网络进行测试。我们发现，一个领域的专家之间的新的科学合作增强了组合创造力。相反，新手的高入门率与生成创造力负相关。通过扩展这组有用的概念，创造性的科学家获得了中心地位。同时，通过增加科学界的中心地位，科学家们可以复制和推广他们的结果，从而促进科学范式的发展。

'Dynamic Collaboration' from Scientists' Eyes

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅