...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Ocean & coastal management >Controversies over stakeholder participation in marine protected area (MPA) management: A case study of the Cabo de Palos-Islas Hormigas MPA
【24h】

Controversies over stakeholder participation in marine protected area (MPA) management: A case study of the Cabo de Palos-Islas Hormigas MPA

机译：利益相关方参与海洋保护区（MPA）管理的争议：以Cabo de Palos-Islas Hormigas MPA为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

There is considerable controversy over the role of stakeholder participation (SP) in the management of marine protected areas (MPAs). On the one hand, SP advocates claim that successful MPAs make use of SP in their design and management. On the other hand, SP critics argue that it is difficult to reach consensus between stakeholders on the need for MPA5, let alone the best way to manage them. This study aimed to investigate the extent of SP in the Cabo de Palos-Islas Hormigas MPA (CPH-MPA) in the Murcia province of south-eastern Spain, with a view to exploring this controversy. The research focused on: the perceptions of respondents on the value of SP in CPH-MPA decision-making; the current extent of SP in the CPH-MPA; the challenges to it; and ways of overcoming those challenges. Fieldwork was carried out during 2013-2015 involving the collection of qualitative data from key informant interviews, community meetings, and individual surveys. These data revealed a high degree of support for SP; very different perceptions about its current extent in CPH-MPA; the existence of many barriers to SP; and several recommendations to address these barriers. The study concluded that since immediate consensus on SP was absent, an experimental approach of adaptive co-management (ACM) could be adopted to determine what kind of SP works best. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译：利益相关方参与（SP）在海洋保护区（MPA）管理中的作用引起很大争议。一方面，SP的拥护者声称成功的MPA在其设计和管理中使用了SP。另一方面，SP评论家认为，利益相关者之间就MPA5的需求很难达成共识，更不用说管理它们的最佳方法了。这项研究旨在调查西班牙东南部穆尔西亚省的Cabo de Palos-Islas Hormigas MPA（CPH-MPA）中SP的程度，以探讨这一争议。研究的重点是：受访者对SP在CPH-MPA决策中的价值的看法； CPH-MPA中当前SP的范围；面临的挑战；以及克服这些挑战的方法。 2013-2015年期间进行了实地调查，涉及从关键知情人访谈，社区会议和个人调查中收集定性数据。这些数据显示了对SP的高度支持。关于其目前在CPH-MPA中的程度的看法有很大不同； SP的障碍很多；以及解决这些障碍的一些建议。该研究得出的结论是，由于尚无关于SP的即时共识，因此可以采用一种实验性的自适应协同管理（ACM）方法来确定哪种SP最有效。 （C）2017 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号