• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Ocean & coastal management >Selection of demonstration sites in the face of conflicting demands and financial limitations
【24h】

Selection of demonstration sites in the face of conflicting demands and financial limitations

机译：面对需求冲突和资金限制选择示范点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Following an allocation of limited financial support from the GEF for three demonstration projects in each of the SCS project's habitat sub-components (mangroves, coral reefs and seagrass), it was necessary to examine the range of potential demonstration sites in the region and formulate a procedure to select those sites having the highest priority for intervention. This paper describes the process developed to select priority demonstration sites in a scientifically sound and objective manner. The procedure was based on a mutually-agreed set of indicators and criteria and involved consensus building with all focal points such that all parties fully understood the procedure and accepted the outcome. The outcome of the project was originally anticipated as being nine regional priority demonstration sites, three focussing on each sub-component (i.e., mangroves, seagrass and coral reefs). Additional outcomes not envisaged during project design included: 1. Regionally prioritised listings of potential demonstration sites as follows: ① 26 mangrove sites; ② 43 coral reef sites; ③ 26 seagrass sites; and ④ 40 wetlands sites (15 estuaries; 12 inter-tidal mudflats; 7 coastal lagoons; and 6 swamp forest sites). 2. Draft proposals for interventions in 23 sites across all habitat types; 3. An inter-governmentally agreed procedure for determining regional priorities that could be used to rank sites both nationally and regionally in the future; 4. A regional GIS database having a large number of sites characterised in geographical and environmental, including biological, terms; 5. Application of the approach at national level in two countries to determine national priorities for intervention; and 6. A procedure and process that serves as a potential model for replication elsewhere when choices between alternative sites for intervention must be made to satisfy financial limitations.
机译：在全球环境基金为南南合作项目的每个生境子组成部分（红树林，珊瑚礁和海草）的三个示范项目分配了有限的资金支持之后，有必要研究该地区潜在示范地点的范围并制定一个选择那些具有最高优先级的站点进行干预的过程。本文介绍了以科学合理和客观的方式选择优先示范点的过程。该程序以一套相互商定的指标和标准为基础，并涉及与所有联络点的共识建立，以便所有各方都充分理解该程序并接受结果。最初预期该项目的结果将是九个区域优先示范点，三个重点放在每个子组成部分（即红树林，海草和珊瑚礁）。在项目设计过程中未设想到的其他结果包括：1.按地区划分的优先示范点列表如下：①26个红树林场； ②43处珊瑚礁； ③26个海草场； ④40个湿地（15个河口； 12个潮间带滩涂； 7个沿海泻湖； 6个沼泽林地）。 2.在所有生境类型的23个地点进行干预的提议草案； 3.确定区域优先事项的政府间商定程序，可用于将来对国家和地区站点进行排名； 4.区域性地理信息系统数据库，具有大量以地理和环境（包括生物学）术语为特征的站点； 5.在两个国家在国家一级采用该方法以确定国家干预重点； 6.当必须在可供选择的干预地点之间进行选择以满足财务限制时，该程序和过程可作为在其他地方复制的潜在模型。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ocean & coastal management》 |2013年第ptab期|186-200|共15页
  • 作者

    John C. Pernetta; Yihang Jiang;

  • 作者单位

    South China Sea Project Coordinating Unit, United Nations Building, UN ESCAP, Ratchadamnoen-Nok Avenue, Bangkok 10200, Thailand,35/323 Yingrouwes Niwet, Bangtalad, Pak Kret, Nonthaburi 11120, Thailand;

    South China Sea Project Coordinating Unit, United Nations Building, UN ESCAP, Ratchadamnoen-Nok Avenue, Bangkok 10200, Thailand,2-3-13,40B, Fu Cheng Men Wai Avenue, Beijing 100037, China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号