...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Online Information Review >Using Google Scholar for journal impact factors and the h-index in nationwide publishing assessments in academia - siren songs and air-raid sirens
【24h】

Using Google Scholar for journal impact factors and the h-index in nationwide publishing assessments in academia - siren songs and air-raid sirens

机译：在学术界全国范围内的评估中使用Google学术搜索获取期刊影响因子和h指数-警笛声和防空警报器

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Purpose - Google Scholar has been increasingly used in the past six to seven years as a highly efficient information source and service by librarians and other information professionals. The problem is when Google Scholar is touted and used as a bibliometric/scientometric tool and resource in the assessment of the quantity (productivity) and quality (impact) of research publications, in formal and informal ways, for decisions related to tenure, promotion and grant applications of individual researchers and research groups, as well as in journal subscriptions and cancellations. This paper aims to examine this issue. Design/methodology/approach - The paper discusses the use of Google Scholar for journal impact factors and the h-index in nationwide publishing assessments in academia. It focuses on the issues of access and excess in Google Scholar: the innate limits of Google Scholar and those imposed by its developers on the users. Findings - The paper reveals that issues of access and excess in Google Scholar prevent the researchers from doing appropriate content analysis that the best librarians and other information professionals do systematically to discover the pros and cons of databases. The excess content grossly dilutes the originally worthy collection of scholarly publications. The accuracy, reliability and reproducibility are essential for realistic research assessment through the prism of the quantity (publication counts) and quality (citation counts) of scholarly works. Unfortunately the metadata created by Google Scholar is substandard, neither reliable nor reproducible and it distorts the metric indicators at the individual, corporate and journal levels. Originality/value - The paper provides useful information on the use of Google Scholar for journal impact factors and the h-index in academic publishing.
机译：目的-在过去的六到七年中，Google学术搜索已越来越多地用作图书馆员和其他信息专业人员的高效信息源和服务。问题在于，当Google学术搜索被吹捧并用作文献计量/科学计量工具和资源时，以正式和非正式的方式评估研究出版物的数量（生产率）和质量（影响），以进行与权属，晋升和管理有关的决策。授予个人研究人员和研究小组的申请，以及期刊的订阅和取消。本文旨在研究这个问题。设计/方法/方法-本文讨论了Google学术搜索在期刊影响因子和h指数在全国学术评估中的使用。它着重于Google Scholar中的访问和超额问题：Google Scholar的固有限制以及开发人员对用户施加的限制。调查结果-本文揭示了Google学术搜索中的访问和超额问题使研究人员无法进行适当的内容分析，而最好的图书馆员和其他信息专业人士会系统地进行相应的内容分析，以发现数据库的优缺点。多余的内容会严重稀释原本值得收藏的学术出版物。准确性，可靠性和可重复性对于通过学术作品的数量（出版物计数）和质量（引用计数）进行现实的研究评估至关重要。不幸的是，由Google Scholar创建的元数据不合标准，既不可靠也不具有可重复性，并且扭曲了个人，公司和期刊级别的指标指标。原创性/价值-本文提供了有关将Google学术搜索用于期刊影响因子和学术出版中的h指数的有用信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号