• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Organization Studies >Beyond the Stable Image of Institutions: Using Institutional Analysis to Tackle Classic Questions in Institutional Theory
【24h】

Beyond the Stable Image of Institutions: Using Institutional Analysis to Tackle Classic Questions in Institutional Theory

机译：超越制度的稳定形象：利用制度分析来解决制度理论中的经典问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Although institutions are subject to constant change, we retain a stable image of them. Consequently, should they be considered as objects or processes? Notwithstanding its success, institutional theory still faces theoretical challenges to account simultaneously for change and stability, agency and structure. Following recent calls to integrate other perspectives on how we think about institutions, we draw on institutional analysis - a stream that has flourished in Europe and Latin America - to propose a radical and comprehensive conception of the institution as a locus of tension between the instituting (by which institutions are formed) and the instituted (temporarily stabilized forms). Since there is permanent tension between them, the institution itself can never be a stable object. It is constantly evolving, being either reinforced or destabilized. This research enriches the theoretical dialogue between organizational institutionalism and institutional analysis, two streams that have hitherto displayed little cross-fertilization. First, it contributes to rethinking the nature of institutions by emphasizing the role of the social imaginary, thus improving our understanding of the under-theorized role of imagination in institutionalization processes. Second, by placing the dynamic tension between the instituted and the instituting at the core of institutional theories, we answer calls to reclaim their missing critical dimension. Furthermore, this results in a methodological implication: the clinical approach of institutional analysis involving the intervention of researchers allows us to further embed institutional theories in organizational practice.
机译：尽管机构不断变化，但我们仍保持稳定的形象。因此，应该将它们视为对象或过程吗？尽管取得了成功，制度理论仍然面临着同时应对变革与稳定，代理与结构的理论挑战。在最近要求整合其他关于我们如何看待制度的观点的呼吁之后，我们利用制度分析（在欧洲和拉丁美洲盛行的制度分析）提出了关于制度的激进而全面的概念，将其作为机构之间的紧张关系。由哪些机构组成）和机构（暂时稳定的形式）。由于它们之间始终存在紧张关系，因此机构本身永远不可能成为一个稳定的目标。它在不断发展，要么得到加强，要么不稳定。这项研究丰富了组织制度主义与制度分析之间的理论对话，而这两个流向迄今显示出很少的交叉作用。首先，它通过强调社会想象力的作用，有助于重新思考制度的本质，从而增进了我们对想象力在制度化过程中理论不足的作用的理解。其次，通过将制度与机构之间的动态张力置于制度理论的核心，我们回应了要求收回其缺失的关键维度的呼吁。此外，这导致了方法论上的含义：涉及研究人员干预的制度分析的临床方法使我们能够将制度理论进一步嵌入组织实践中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号