• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Philosophical Psychology >Are philosophers expert intuiters?
【24h】

Are philosophers expert intuiters?

机译：哲学家是专家吗？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Recent experimental philosophy arguments have raised trouble for philosophers’ reliance on armchair intuitions. One popular line of response has been the expertise defense: philosophers are highly-trained experts, whereas the subjects in the experimental philosophy studies have generally been ordinary undergraduates, and so there's no reason to think philosophers will make the same mistakes. But this deploys a substantive empirical claim, that philosophers’ training indeed inculcates sufficient protection from such mistakes. We canvass the psychological literature on expertise, which indicates that people are not generally very good at reckoning who will develop expertise under what circumstances. We consider three promising hypotheses concerning what philosophical expertise might consist in: (i) better conceptual schemata; (ii) mastery of entrenched theories; and (iii) general practical know-how with the entertaining of hypotheticals. On inspection, none seem to provide us with good reason to endorse this key empirical premise of the expertise defense. View full textDownload full textKeywordsArmchair Philosophy, Conceptual Schemata, Configural Rules, Experimental Philosophy, Expertise, Intuitions, Restrictionist ChallengeRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2010.490944
机译：最近的实验哲学争论为哲学家依赖扶手椅直觉带来了麻烦。一种普遍的反应是专业知识防御：哲学家是训练有素的专家，而实验哲学研究的学科通常是普通的大学生，因此没有理由认为哲学家会犯同样的错误。但是，这提出了实质性的经验主张，即哲学家的培训确实可以为此类错误提供足够的保护。我们查阅有关专业知识的心理学文献，这表明人们通常不太擅长估算谁将在什么情况下发展专业知识。我们考虑关于哲学专业知识可能包括的三个有前途的假设：（i）更好的概念图式； （ii）掌握根深蒂固的理论； （iii）具有假设性的娱乐性的一般实用知识。在检查中，似乎没有人提供给我们充分的理由来认可专业知识防御的这一关键的经验前提。查看全文下载全文关键字扶手椅哲学，概念图式，配置规则，实验哲学，专业知识，直觉，限制主义者的挑战相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand：“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”，service_compact：“同胞，网民，推特，技术， facebook，stumbleupon，digg，google，more“，发布号：” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2010.490944

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号