• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Philosophical Psychology >Extended cognition and intrinsic properties
【24h】

Extended cognition and intrinsic properties

机译：扩展的认知和内在属性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The hypothesis of extended cognition (HEC) has been criticized as committing what is called the coupling-constitution fallacy, but it is the critic's use of this concept which is fallacious. It is true that there is no reason to deny that the line between the self and the world should be drawn at the skull and/or the skin. But the data used to support HEC reveal that there was never a good enough reason to draw the line there in the first place. The burden of proof has fallen on the mind-brain identity theory, now that our intuitions/prejudices no longer support it. One of those “intuitions” is the Aristotelian assumption that the world can be neatly divided into objects that possess intrinsic causal powers, and the causal relations that connect those objects. In modern science, however, the concept of intrinsic causal powers is only a temporary stopgap that makes it possible to begin research in a particular area. It therefore seems best to assume that the line between mind and world is both pragmatic and dynamic. Consequently, the mind might best described as a fluctuating field, rather than an object or structure.View full textDownload full textKeywordsBehavioral Field, Coupling-Constitution Fallacy, Extended Cognition, Frederick Adams, Robert Rupert, Andy Clark, Kenneth AizawaRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2010.529044
机译：扩展认知（HEC）的假设已被批评为犯有所谓的耦合宪法谬误，但批评者对此概念的使用却是谬误的。的确，没有理由否认自己和世界之间的界线应该绘制在头骨和/或皮肤上。但是，用于支持HEC的数据表明，从来没有足够的理由首先在这里划清界限。既然我们的直觉/偏见不再支持它，举证责任就落在了脑智认同理论上。这些“直觉”之一是亚里士多德的假设，即世界可以被整齐地划分为具有内在因果能力的对象，以及将这些对象联系起来的因果关系。但是，在现代科学中，内在因果力的概念只是暂时的权宜之计，这使得有可能在特定领域开始研究。因此，似乎最好假设思维与世界之间的界线既务实又动态。因此，心智可能最好地描述为一个变动的领域，而不是一个对象或结构。 ：“ Taylor＆Francis Online”，services_compact：“ citeulike，netvibes，twitter，technorati，delicious，linkedin，facebook，stumbleupon，digg，google，more”，pubid：“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2010.529044

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号