• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Policy Studies >Place-making and the limitations of spatial leadership: reflections on the ?resund
【24h】

Place-making and the limitations of spatial leadership: reflections on the ?resund

机译：场所营造和空间领导力的局限性：对反思的反思

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The concepts of place-making and place-shaping have grown in prominence over recent years, and have been taken up increasingly into public policy discourse. As used by many commentators, these concepts assume that places are amenable to purposive control under the leadership of local agencies of one sort or another including, for example, local authorities. The present article explores this assumption by sketching out a framework for the investigation of place-making and shaping, a framework that focuses particularly upon its governance and leadership. It is argued in this context that place-making is an ordering process that combines two modes of governance - spontaneous and purposive - only one of which (the second) is directly amenable to deliberate control and so to leadership of any sort. It is also argued that leadership is a relational phenomenon, and that the leadership relationship will on any occasion be located somewhere between two poles - between leader-dominance and follower-dominance only one of which (the first) is consistent with leadership as this is conventionally understood. Drawing upon the findings from a case study of the 0resund cross-border region, it is concluded that a less conventional sense of leadership is required in the context of place-making and shaping, one that acknowledges the importance of spontaneous governance, and that embraces the possibility of follower-dominance.
机译：近年来，场所营造和场所塑造的概念日益突出，并已越来越多地被纳入公共政策讨论中。正如许多评论员所使用的那样，这些概念假定场所在一种或多种地方机构（包括地方当局）的领导下可以接受有目的的控制。本文通过草绘调查场所制作和塑造的框架来探索这一假设，该框架特别关注其治理和领导力。在这种情况下，有人认为，场所营造是一种有序的过程，结合了自发性和有目的性两种治理模式，只有其中一种（第二种）直接适合于有意控制，因此可以接受任何形式的领导。也有人认为领导是一种关系现象，领导关系在任何情况下都将位于两极之间的某个位置-领导者主导和跟随者主导之间，只有其中一个（第一个）与领导一致，因为这是传统上了解。根据对0resund跨境区域的案例研究得出的结论，得出的结论是，在场所营造和塑造的背景下，需要一种不太传统的领导意识，这种意识承认了自发治理的重要性，并且包括追随者支配的可能性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Policy Studies》 |2010年第4期|P.475-489|共15页
  • 作者

    Chris Collinge; John Gibney;

  • 作者单位

    The Centre for Urban and Regional Studies, Birmingham Business School, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK;

    The Centre for Urban and Regional Studies, Birmingham Business School, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    governance; dominance; leadership; place-making; place-shaping;

    机译：治理;支配地位领导;场所营造;整形;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号