• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Policy Studies >Trouble with champions: local public sector-third sector partnerships and the future prospects for collaborative governance in the UK
【24h】

Trouble with champions: local public sector-third sector partnerships and the future prospects for collaborative governance in the UK

机译：拥护者的麻烦：英国地方公共部门与第三部门的伙伴关系以及英国合作治理的未来前景

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In Britain, the former Labour government employed a range of collaborative governance initiatives to get public sector officers (PSOs) and third sector champions (TSCs) working together successfully. This article draws upon evidence from a series of policy seminars undertaken in a subregion of North East England to explore the strengths and weaknesses of inter- and intra-sector relationships. The article shows that PSOs' perceptions of the 'troublesomeness' of TSCs arise from, firstly, difficulties in communicating effectively with the third sector because of TSCs' inability to represent sector-wide interests effectively. Secondly, because many TSCs are unwilling to conform to public sector protocol, this leads to accusations of unprofessional practice. The article considers whether the perception of TSCs as troublesome can be interpreted as a convenient device when PSOs are reticent about yielding control over the delivery of public sector services to the third sector. In the context of significant reductions in public sector funding by the new coalition government, the article concludes that the landscape of partnership working and prospects for collaborative governance will change significantly - but not necessarily always to the detriment of inter-sector relationships.
机译：在英国，前工党政府采取了一系列协作治理措施，以使公共部门官员（PSO）和第三部门倡导者（TSC）成功地合作。本文借鉴了英格兰东北部一个次区域举办的一系列政策研讨会的证据，以探讨部门间和部门间关系的优缺点。该文章表明，由于TSC无法有效代表整个行业的利益，PSO对TSC的“麻烦”的认识首先来自于与第三部门有效沟通的困难。其次，由于许多TSC不愿遵守公共部门的协议，这导致了对非专业实践的指控。本文认为，当PSO沉默对待对公共部门向第三部门的服务交付进行控制时，是否可以将TSC的麻烦理解为一种方便的手段。在新的联合政府大幅削减公共部门资金的背景下，文章得出结论，伙伴关系的工作环境和协作治理的前景将发生重大变化，但不一定总是有害于部门间关系。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Policy Studies》 |2010年第6期|p.613-630|共18页
  • 作者

    Tony Chapman; Judith Brown; Chris Ford; Beth Baxter;

  • 作者单位

    Social Futures Institute, School of Social Sciences and Law, Teesside University, Middlesbrough,TS1 3BA, UK;

    rnSocial Futures Institute, School of Social Sciences and Law, Teesside University, Middlesbrough,TS1 3BA, UK;

    rnSocial Futures Institute, School of Social Sciences and Law, Teesside University, Middlesbrough,TS1 3BA, UK;

    rnSocial Futures Institute, School of Social Sciences and Law, Teesside University, Middlesbrough,TS1 3BA, UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    voluntary and community sector; professionalism; public service delivery; partnership; big society;

    机译：志愿和社区部门;专业精神公共服务提供;合伙;大社会;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号