• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Policy Studies >Policy diffusion and policy transfer
【24h】

Policy diffusion and policy transfer

机译：政策传播和政策转移

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article argues that the literatures on policy transfer and policy diffusion are complimentary, but need to focus more clearly on five key issues drawing insights from both literatures. First, work in each area can benefit from a greater focus on the changing interactions between the various mechanisms involved in diffusion/ transfer. Second, the diffusion literature privileges structure, while the transfer literature privileges agency, but we need an approach which recognizes the dialectical relationship between the two. Third, the diffusion literature concentrates on pattern-finding, while the transfer literature examines process-tracing, but any full explanation of transfer/diffusion needs to do both. Fourth, both literatures suffer from skewed case selection with, in particular, too little attention paid to developing countries. Finally, while both literatures need to be interested in whether diffusion/transfer is likely to be successful/unsuccessful, neither considers any criteria that might be used to establish policy success and failure.
机译：本文认为，关于政策转移和政策扩散的文献是互补的，但需要更明确地关注五个关键问题，以从这两个文献中得出见解。首先，每个领域的工作都可以受益于对扩散/转移所涉及的各种机制之间不断变化的相互作用的更加关注。其次，传播文学的特权结构虽然是传播文学的特权机构，但我们需要一种认识两者之间的辩证关系的方法。第三，扩散文献着重于模式寻找，而转移文献则研究过程跟踪，但是对转移/扩散的任何完整解释都需要同时进行。第四，这两种文献的病例选择都存在偏差，尤其是对发展中国家的关注不足。最后，虽然两个文献都需要关注扩散/转移是否可能成功/不成功，但都没有考虑任何可用于确定政策成败的标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号