• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Policy Studies >Beyond 'linking knowledge and action': towards a practice-based approach to transdisciplinary sustainability interventions
【24h】

Beyond 'linking knowledge and action': towards a practice-based approach to transdisciplinary sustainability interventions

机译：超越“知识与行动之间的联系”：迈向基于实践的跨学科可持续性干预措施

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The imperative to "link knowledge and action" is widely invoked as a defining characteristic of sustainability research. The complexities of sustainability challenges such as climate change and biodiversity loss mean that linear models of knowledge and action, where knowledge is produced first (by researchers) then "applied to" action (by policy actors), are considered insufficient. Researchers have developed more dynamic, open-ended and collaborative forms of policy engagement such as transdisciplinary and co-production research. Although promising these approaches often remain captive to linear assumptions that hinder their transformative potential. We contribute by providing a relational model of knowledge and action rooted in contemporary practice theory. A practice-based approach suggests the primary task of participants in transdisciplinary interventions is to find workable solutions to situations of dynamic complexity that are fundamentally indeterminate and unpredictable. Knowledge is not "applied to" action, but drawn upon, produced and used from within the situation at hand, allowing researchers and policy actors alike to better harness the emergent character of situational developments and outcomes. A practice-based approach provides a conceptual language that captures the experienced complexities of intervening for sustainability, reconfigures the nature of "actionable knowledge," and identifies appropriate modes of evaluation for transdisciplinary and co-produced research.
机译：“将知识与行动联系起来”的必要性被广泛引用为可持续性研究的定义特征。诸如气候变化和生物多样性丧失之类的可持续性挑战的复杂性意味着，知识和行动的线性模型被认为是不够的，先是（研究人员）产生知识，然后“应用于”行动（由政策参与者）。研究人员已经开发出更具活力，开放性和协作性的政策参与形式，例如跨学科研究和联合生产研究。尽管这些方法很有前途，但它们通常仍会束缚于阻碍其变革潜力的线性假设。我们通过提供扎根于当代实践理论的知识与行动的关系模型来做出贡献。基于实践的方法表明，跨学科干预的参与者的主要任务是找到从根本上不确定且不可预测的动态复杂情况的可行解决方案。知识不是“应用于”行动，而是从当前情况中汲取，产生和使用的，使研究人员和政策参与者都可以更好地利用情况发展和结果的新兴特征。基于实践的方法提供了一种概念性语言，该语言捕获了为实现可持续性而进行干预的经验复杂性，重新配置了“可操作知识”的性质，并确定了跨学科研究和联合研究的适当评估方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号