• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Policy Studies >Beyond 'linking knowledge and action': towards a practice-based approach to transdisciplinary sustainability interventions
【24h】

Beyond 'linking knowledge and action': towards a practice-based approach to transdisciplinary sustainability interventions

机译：除了“联系知识和行动”之外：走向基于实践的跨学科可持续性干预方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The imperative to "link knowledge and action" is widely invoked as a defining characteristic of sustainability research. The complexities of sustainability challenges such as climate change and biodiversity loss mean that linear models of knowledge and action, where knowledge is produced first (by researchers) then "applied to" action (by policy actors), are considered insufficient. Researchers have developed more dynamic, open-ended and collaborative forms of policy engagement such as transdisciplinary and co-production research. Although promising these approaches often remain captive to linear assumptions that hinder their transformative potential. We contribute by providing a relational model of knowledge and action rooted in contemporary practice theory. A practice-based approach suggests the primary task of participants in transdisciplinary interventions is to find workable solutions to situations of dynamic complexity that are fundamentally indeterminate and unpredictable. Knowledge is not "applied to" action, but drawn upon, produced and used from within the situation at hand, allowing researchers and policy actors alike to better harness the emergent character of situational developments and outcomes. A practice-based approach provides a conceptual language that captures the experienced complexities of intervening for sustainability, reconfigures the nature of "actionable knowledge," and identifies appropriate modes of evaluation for transdisciplinary and co-produced research.
机译：“链接知识和行动”的必要性被广泛调用为可持续性研究的定义特征。可持续发展挑战的复杂性，如气候变化和生物多样性损失意味着知识和行动的线性模型，其中知识首先产生（按研究人员）“适用于”行动（通过政策行为者），被认为是不够的。研究人员制定了更具活力，开放的和协作形式的政策参与，如跨学科和共同生产研究。虽然有希望的这些方法通常仍然是妨碍其变革潜力的线性假设。我们通过提供植根于当代实践理论的知识和行动的关系模型来贡献。基于练习的方法表明，参与者在跨学科干预方面的主要任务是找到动态复杂性的情况，这些方法从根本上不确定和无法预测。知识并非“适用于”行动，而是从手中的局势中汲取，制作和使用，允许研究人员和政策参与者更好地利用情境发展和结果的紧急性质。一种基于实践的方法提供了一种概念语言，捕获了介入可持续性的经验丰富的复杂性，重新配置“可操作知识”的性质，并确定了跨学科和共同生成研究的适当评估模式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号