...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Public Administration and Development >FIGHTING CORRUPTION WITH SOCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SOCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY MECHANISMS' POTENTIAL TO REDUCE CORRUPTION IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
【24h】

FIGHTING CORRUPTION WITH SOCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SOCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY MECHANISMS' POTENTIAL TO REDUCE CORRUPTION IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

机译：与社会责任制搏斗：对公共行政管理中减少社会责任制的社会责任机制的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Given the poor track record of traditional anti-corruption initiatives, donors and governments are increasingly looking at how civil society can fight corruption in public administration. Social accountability mechanisms intend to perform this role by holding officials directly accountable through citizen engagement. However, this article argues that social accountability mechanisms are only capable of reducing corruption systemically if they activate horizontal accountability and sustain it through the sanctioning mechanisms of electoral accountability. A comparative case study analysis using the cases of the Ugandan Public Expenditure Tracking Survey and the Bangalore Citizen Report Card is applied to test this hypothesis. The Tanzanian Public Expenditure Tracking Survey and an example of citizen engagement in Mumbai are employed as shadow cases to provide additional evidence for the hypothesis. The results indicate that social accountability mechanisms must be inclusive, broad, with public effect and embedded in other accountability relationships to fight corruption effectively. Electoral accountability is key, and support to social accountability mechanisms should therefore always be well placed within a broader agenda aimed at strengthening democratic governance.
机译：鉴于传统反腐败举措的往绩不佳，捐助者和政府越来越多地关注民间社会如何在公共行政中打击腐败。社会责任机制旨在通过让官员通过公民参与直接承担责任来履行这一职责。但是，本文认为，社会责任机制只有在激活水平责任制并通过选举责任制制裁机制维持其水平的情况下，才能系统地减少腐败。使用乌干达公共支出追踪调查和班加罗尔公民报告卡的案例进行了比较案例研究分析，以检验该假设。坦桑尼亚公共支出追踪调查和孟买市民参与的例子被用作影子案件，为这一假设提供了补充证据。结果表明，社会责任机制必须具有包容性，广泛性，并具有公共效应，并应包含在其他责任关系中以有效打击腐败。选举问责制是关键，因此对社会问责制的支持应始终放在旨在加强民主治理的更广泛议程中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号