• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Public understanding of science >A surfeit of science: The 'CSI effect' and the media appropriation of the public understanding of science
【24h】

A surfeit of science: The 'CSI effect' and the media appropriation of the public understanding of science

机译：科学的过剩：“ CSI效应”和媒体对公众对科学理解的占有

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Over the past decade, popular media has promulgated claims that the television program CSI and its spinoffs and imitators have had a pernicious effect on the public understanding of forensic science, the so-called "CSI effect." This paper analyzes those media claims by documenting the ways in which the media claims that CSI "distorts" an imagined "reality." It shows that the media appropriated the analytic stance usually adopted by science advocates, portraying the CSI effect as a social problem in science communication. This appropriation was idiosyncratic in that it posited, as a social problem, a "surfeit" of knowledge and positive imagery about science, rather than the more familiar "deficits." In addition, the media simultaneously appropriated both "traditional" and "critical" PUS discourses. Despite this apparent contradiction, the paper concludes that, in both discourses, the media and its expert informants insist upon their hegemony over "the public" to articulate the "reality" of forensic science.
机译：在过去的十年中，流行媒体已经宣称电视节目CSI及其衍生产品和模仿者对公众对法医学的理解产生了有害影响，即所谓的“ CSI效应”。本文通过记录媒体声称CSI“扭曲”想象的“现实”的方式来分析这些媒体主张。它表明，媒体采用了科学倡导者通常采用的分析立场，将CSI效应描述为科学传播中的一个社会问题。这种分配是特质的，因为它把社会的知识“过剩”和对科学的积极印象假定为一种社会问题，而不是更为熟悉的“缺陷”。此外，媒体同时采用“传统”和“批评” PUS话语。尽管存在这种明显的矛盾，但论文的结论是，在两种情况下，媒体及其专家线人都坚持对“公众”的霸权，以阐明司法科学的“现实性”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号