首页> 外文期刊>Public understanding of science >Truth and opinion in climate change discourse: The Gore-Hansen disagreement
【24h】

Truth and opinion in climate change discourse: The Gore-Hansen disagreement

机译:气候变化话语中的真相与见解:戈尔-汉森分歧

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this paper, I discuss the "inconvenient truth" strategy of Al Gore. I argue that Gore's notion of truth upholds a conception of science and policy that narrows our understanding of climate change discourse. In one notable exchange, Gore and NASA scientist, James Hansen, disagreed about whether scientific statements based on Hansen's computer simulations were truth or opinion. This exchange is featured in An Inconvenient Truth, yet the disagreement is edited from the film and presented simply as an instance of Hansen speaking "inconvenient truth." In this article, I compare the filmic representation of Hansen's testimony with the congressional record. I place their exchange in a broader historical perspective on climate change disputation in order to discuss the implications of Gore's perspective on truth.
机译:在本文中,我将讨论阿尔·戈尔的“不便事实”策略。我认为戈尔的真理概念秉承了科学和政策的概念,从而缩小了我们对气候变化话语的理解。在一次值得注意的交流中,戈尔和NASA科学家詹姆斯·汉森(James Hansen)就基于汉森计算机模拟的科学陈述是真理还是观点持不同意见。这种交流以《不便的真相》为特色,但分歧是从影片中编辑出来的,只是作为汉森讲“不便的真相”的一个实例而呈现。在本文中,我将汉森的证词的电影表现形式与国会记录进行了比较。我将他们的交流放在关于气候变化争议的更广泛的历史观点上,以讨论戈尔的观点对真理的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号