• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Reference reviews >Comparison of core full text coverage in CINAHL Complete, ProQuest's Nursing and Allied Health Source and Lippincott Wilkins and Wilson's Nursing & Health Professionals Premier Collection
【24h】

Comparison of core full text coverage in CINAHL Complete, ProQuest's Nursing and Allied Health Source and Lippincott Wilkins and Wilson's Nursing & Health Professionals Premier Collection

机译：比较CINAHL Complete，ProQuest的护理和专职健康资料库以及Lippincott Wilkins和Wilson的《护理与健康专业人士》专业版的核心全文覆盖范围

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Purpose - This paper aims to assess relative full-text coverage of core nursing and allied health journals in three databases: CINAHL Complete, ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Source and Lippincott Wilkins and Wilson (LWW)'s Nursing & Health Professionals Premier Collection. Design/methodology/approach - The 2012 Nursing and Allied Health Resources Section (NAHRS) of the MLA list of 213 core nursing journals and the 1996 Brandon Hill list of 75 important allied journals were checked against full-text coverage of the three databases. Findings - CINAHL Complete provided 126 of 213 titles or 59 per cent of NAHRS titles and 31 of 75 or 41 per cent of the Brandon Hill titles; ProQuest provided 74 of 213 titles or 35 per cent of NAHRS titles and 27 of 75 or 36 per cent of the Brandon Hill titles; LWW provided 42 of 213 or 20 per cent of NAHRS titles and 5 of 75 or 6 per cent of the Brandon Hill titles. Research limitations/implications - If researchers have access to CINAHL Complete, they have access with that single database to significant coverage of quality nursing and allied health titles. The other two databases provide additional coverage and some unique title coverage, but their offerings are more limited. Originality/value - As no studies comparing full-text coverage of core nursing and allied health journals in three databases, CINAHL Complete, ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Source and LWW's Nursing & Health Professionals Premier Collection, exist, this study fills that need for librarians.
机译：目的-本文旨在评估三个数据库中核心护理和相关健康期刊的相对全文覆盖率：CINAHL Complete，ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Source和Lippincott Wilkins and Wilson（LWW）的“护理与健康专业人员专业收藏”。设计/方法/方法-根据这三个数据库的全文覆盖率，对2012年美国护理协会（MLA）的213种核心护理期刊和1996年布兰登·希尔（Brandon Hill）的75种重要联合期刊进行了检查。调查结果-CINAHL Complete提供了213个标题中的126个，占NAHRS标题的59％，以及75个类别中的31个，即41％的Brandon Hill标题； ProQuest提供了213个职称中的74个，占NAHRS职称的35％，提供了75个职位中的27个，占布兰登希尔职称的36％； LWW提供了NAHRS头衔中的213个中的42个，占20％，Brandon Hill头衔中的75个中的5个，即6％。研究的局限性/意义-如果研究人员可以使用CINAHL Complete，则可以使用单个数据库来访问高质量的护理和相关健康职称。其他两个数据库提供了额外的覆盖范围和一些独特的标题覆盖范围，但是它们的功能更为有限。原创性/价值-由于尚无研究比较CINAHL Complete，ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Source和LWW的Nursing＆Health Professionals Premier三个数据库中核心护理和相关健康期刊的全文报道，因此该研究满足了图书馆员的需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号