• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Regional Environmental Change >Blind spots in ecosystem services research and challenges for implementation
【24h】

Blind spots in ecosystem services research and challenges for implementation

机译：生态系统服务研究的盲点和实施挑战

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Ecosystem service research is high on the policy agenda. Strategies to synthesize individual success stories and derive generalized results to provide guidance for policymakers and stakeholder is central to many science-policy initiatives, such as Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services and The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity. However, generalization requires the documentation of basic information on methods and results of case studies, which might not be present throughout all case studies. We used a quantitative review based on a random sample of studies published in the ISI Web of Knowledge between 1996 and 2016 to identify blind spots in ecosystem service research that might hinder the generalization. We structured our analysis along critical questions about five facets that characterize the holistic ideal of ecosystem services research: (i) social-ecological validity of ecosystem data and models, (ii) consideration of trade-offs between ecosystem services, (iii) recognition of off-site effects, (iv) comprehensive and shrewd involv ement of stakeholders, and (v) relevance and usability of study results for the operationalization of the ecosystem service concept in practice. Results show that these facets were not addressed by the majority of case studies including more recent studies. Clusters of ecosystem services studied together were prone to different blind spots. To effectively operationalize the concept of ecosystem services, the blind spots need to be addressed by upcoming studies. A list of critical questions is provided to raise the awareness of the blind spots both for synthesis of existing knowledge and for future research agendas.
机译：生态系统服务研究在政策议程中处于重要位置。综合个人成功案例并获得概括性结果以为决策者和利益相关者提供指导的策略，对于许多科学政策举措（如政府间生物多样性和生态系统服务科学政策平台和生态系统和生物多样性经济学政策平台）至关重要。但是，泛化需要有关案例研究的方法和结果的基本信息的文档，而这些文档可能不会出现在所有案例研究中。我们根据ISI Web of Knowledge在1996年至2016年之间发布的随机研究样本，使用了定量综述，以识别可能阻碍泛化的生态系统服务研究盲点。我们根据有关生态系统服务研究整体理想的五个方面的关键问题来构建分析：（i）生态系统数据和模型的社会生态有效性，（ii）考虑生态系统服务之间的权衡取舍，（iii）对生态系统服务的权衡取舍场外影响，（iv）利益相关者的全面而精明的参与，以及（v）在实践中将生态系统服务概念付诸实践的研究结果的相关性和可用性。结果表明，大多数案例研究（包括较新的研究）并未解决这些方面的问题。一起研究的生态系统服务集群容易出现不同的盲点。为了有效地实施生态系统服务的概念，需要在即将进行的研究中解决盲点。提供了一系列关键问题，以提高人们对盲点的认识，以了解现有知识的综合情况以及未来的研究议程。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Regional Environmental Change》 |2019年第8期|2151-2172|共22页
  • 作者

    Lautenbach Sven; Mupepele Anne-Christine; Dormann Carsten F.; Lee Heera; Schmidt Stefan; Scholte Samantha S. K.; Seppelt Ralf; Van Teeffelen Astrid J. A.; Verhagen Willem; Volk Martin;

  • 作者单位

    Heidelberg Univ Inst Geog GIScience Res Grp Neuenheimer Feld 348 DE-69120 Heidelberg Germany|Univ Bonn Inst Geodesy Agr Fac Geoinformation Professorship Land Use Modeling EcoSyst Services Nussallee 1 DE-53115 Bonn Germany|Helmholtz Centre Environm Res Dept Computat Landscape Ecol UFZ Permoserstr 15 Leipzig Germany;

    Univ Freiburg Biometry & Environm Syst Anal Freiburg Germany|Univ Freiburg Nat Conservat & Landscape Ecol Freiburg Germany;

    Univ Freiburg Biometry & Environm Syst Anal Freiburg Germany;

    Univ Bonn Inst Geodesy Agr Fac Geoinformation Professorship Land Use Modeling EcoSyst Services Nussallee 1 DE-53115 Bonn Germany|Karlsruhe Inst Technol Inst Meteorol Climate Res Atmospher Environm Res IMK IFU Kreuzeckbahnstr. 19 DE-82467 Garmisch Partenkirchen Germany;

    Helmholtz Centre Environm Res Dept Computat Landscape Ecol UFZ Permoserstr 15 Leipzig Germany;

    Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Inst Environm Studies Fac Sci Environm Geog Grp IVM Boelelaan 1087 NL-1081 HV Amsterdam Netherlands;

    Helmholtz Centre Environm Res Dept Computat Landscape Ecol UFZ Permoserstr 15 Leipzig Germany|Univ Halle Inst Geoscience & Geog Martin Luther DE-06099 Halle Germany|German Centre Integrat Biodivers Res iDiv DE-04103 Leipzig Germany;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Operationalization; Stakeholder involvement; Good modeling practice; Quantitative review; Off-site effects; Trade-offs;

    机译：运营化;利益相关者的参与;良好的建模习惯;定量审查;场外影响;权衡取舍;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号