• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Research policy >Allocative Efficiency In Public Research Funding: Can Bibliometrics Help?
【24h】

Allocative Efficiency In Public Research Funding: Can Bibliometrics Help?

机译：公共研究经费分配效率：文献计量学可以帮助吗？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The use of outcome control modes of research evaluation exercises is ever more frequent. They are conceived as tools to stimulate increased levels of research productivity, and to guide choices in allocating components of government research budgets for publicly funded institutions. There are several contributions in the literature that compare the different methodological approaches that policy makers could adopt for these exercises, however the comparisons are limited to only a few disciplines. This work, examining the case of the whole of the "hard sciences" of the Italian academic system, makes a comparison between results obtained from peer review type of evaluations (as adopted by the Ministry of Universities and Research) and those possible from a bibliometric approach (as developed by the authors). The aim is to understand to what extent bibliometric methodology, which is noted as relatively inexpensive, time-saving and exhaustive, can complement and integrate peer review methodology in research evaluation.
机译：研究评估活动的结果控制模式的使用越来越普遍。它们被认为是刺激提高研究生产率水平的工具，并指导政府为公共资助机构分配政府研究预算组成部分的选择。文献中有几篇文章比较了政策制定者可以针对这些活动采用的不同方法论方法，但是，这种比较仅限于少数学科。这项工作审查了意大利学术体系的整个“硬科学”的情况，将同行评议类型的评估结果（由大学和研究部采用）与文献计量法的结果进行了比较。方法（由作者开发）。目的是了解文献计量学方法在什么程度上可以被认为是相对便宜，省时和详尽的，可以在同行评审方法中进行补充和整合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号