首页> 外文期刊>Risk analysis >Consumer Risk Perceptions Toward Agricultural Biotechnology, Self-Protection, and Food Demand: The Case of Milk in the United States
【24h】

Consumer Risk Perceptions Toward Agricultural Biotechnology, Self-Protection, and Food Demand: The Case of Milk in the United States

机译:消费者对农业生物技术,自我保护和食品需求的风险认知:以美国牛奶为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study is an econometric systems approach to modeling the factors and linkages affecting risk perceptions toward agricultural biotechnology, self-protection actions, and food demand. This model is applied to milk in the United States, but it can be adapted to other products as well as other categories of risk perceptions. The contribution of this formulation is the ability to examine how explanatory factors influence risk perceptions and whether they translate into behavior and ultimately what impact this has on aggregate markets. Hadden's outrage factors on heightening risk perceptions are among the factors examined. In particular, the article examines the role of labeling as a means of permitting informed consent to mitigate outrage factors. The effects of attitudinal, economic, and demographic factors on risk perceptions are also explored, as well as the linkage between risk perceptions, consumer behavior, and food demand. Because risk perceptions and self-protection actions are categorical variables and demand is a continuous variable, the model is estimated as a two-stage mixed system with a covariance correction procedure suggested by Amemiya. The findings indicate that it is the availability of labeling, not the price difference, between that labeled milk and milk produced with recombinant bovine Somatotropin (rbST) that significantly affects consumer's selection of rbST-free milk. The results indicate that greater availability of labeled milk would not only significantly increase the proportion of consumers who purchased labeled milk, its availability would also reduce the perception of risk associated with rbST, whether consumers purchase it or not. In other words, availability of rbST-free milk translates into lower risk perceptions toward milk produced with rbST.
机译:这项研究是一种计量经济学的系统方法,可以对影响对农业生物技术,自我保护行动和粮食需求的风险感知的因素和联系进行建模。该模型在美国适用于牛奶,但可以适用于其他产品以及其他类别的风险感知。此公式的作用是检查以下因素的能力:解释性因素如何影响风险感知,以及它们是否转化为行为,以及最终对总体市场产生何种影响。哈登在提高风险意识方面的愤怒因素是所考察的因素之一。尤其是,本文探讨了标签作为允许知情同意减轻愤怒因素的一种手段的作用。还探讨了态度,经济和人口因素对风险感知的影响,以及风险感知,消费者行为和食品需求之间的联系。由于风险感知和自我保护行为是分类变量,需求是连续变量,因此该模型被估计为两阶段混合系统,并由Amemiya建议采用协方差校正程序。研究结果表明,标记的牛奶与使用重组牛生长激素(rbST)生产的牛奶之间的标签可获得性,而不是价格差异,会显着影响消费者对不含rbST的牛奶的选择。结果表明,标记牛奶的更大可用性不仅会大大增加购买标记牛奶的消费者比例,而且无论是否购买rbST,其可用性都会降低与rbST相关的风险感知。换句话说,不含rbST的牛奶的可获得性转化为使用rbST生产的牛奶的较低风险感知。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号