• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Science, Technology and Human Values >Transdisciplinary Sustainability Research in Practice: Between Imaginaries of Collective Experimentation and Entrenched Academic Value Orders
【24h】

Transdisciplinary Sustainability Research in Practice: Between Imaginaries of Collective Experimentation and Entrenched Academic Value Orders

机译：实践中的跨学科可持续性研究：在集体实验的想象中和根深蒂固的学术价值秩序之间

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Over the past decades, we have witnessed calls for greater transdisciplinary engagement between scientific and societal actors to develop more robust answers to complex societal challenges. Although there seems to be agreement that these approaches might nurture innovations of a new kind, we know little regarding the research practices, their potential, and the limitations. To fill this gap, this article investigates a funding scheme in the area of transdisciplinary sustainability research. It offers a detailed analysis of the imaginaries and expectations on which the funding scheme rests and how researchers actually practice transdisciplinarity within the respective projects. Identifying three ideal typical models of science-society relations at work, attention is paid to how, where, and when societal and scientific arenas get (dis-)entangled. This article discusses (1) the tensions between classical academic values and efforts to open research to society, (2) the prevailing power structures that make societal participation challenging, (3) the importance of place and technopolitical cultures, and (4) how temporal project structures impede more radical openings to new ways of knowledge production. We finally emphasize that transdisciplinary knowledge production can only become a serious option for addressing societal challenges if broader changes are made to the knowledge regimes in place.
机译：在过去的几十年中，我们目睹了呼吁科学和社会行为者之间更多的跨学科参与，以为复杂的社会挑战找到更强有力的答案。尽管似乎已经同意这些方法可以培育一种新型的创新，但是我们对研究实践，其潜力和局限性知之甚少。为了填补这一空白，本文研究了跨学科可持续性研究领域的一项资助计划。它提供了对资助计划所依据的假想和期望的详细分析，以及研究人员如何在各个项目中实际实践跨学科性。确定了工作中科学与社会关系的三种理想典型模型后，应注意社会与科学领域的纠缠方式，位置和时间。本文讨论（1）古典学术价值观与向社会开放研究的努力之间的张力；（2）使社会参与具有挑战性的主要权力结构；（3）地方和技术政治文化的重要性；（4）时态如何项目结构阻碍了更多新的知识生产方式的开放。我们最后强调，如果对现有的知识体系进行更广泛的变革，跨学科的知识生产就只能成为应对社会挑战的一种重要选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号