• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Social influence >A slice of hygiene: justification and consequence in the persuasiveness of prescriptive and proscriptive signs
【24h】

A slice of hygiene: justification and consequence in the persuasiveness of prescriptive and proscriptive signs

机译：一小部分卫生：说明性和说明性标志的说服力及其合理性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Studies concerning sign effectiveness highlight the use of justifications and information about consequences of non-compliance. Assuming that the most persuasive messages contain both types of information, we compared the effectiveness of eight different signs (that encouraged supermarket shoppers to hygienically handle bread). The independent variables were (a) sign content (justification vs. consequence vs. justification and consequence vs. neutral) and (b) form of request (prescriptive vs. proscriptive). After assessing the subjective level of the signs' persuasiveness through a survey (N = 240), we observed people's compliance in a natural experiment (N = 1.440). Signs containing both a justification and information about consequences achieved the highest rating and actual compliance.
机译：有关标志有效性的研究强调了使用正当理由和有关违规后果的信息。假设最具说服力的消息包含两种类型的信息，我们比较了八个不同标志（鼓励超市购物者卫生处理面包）的有效性。自变量是（a）符号内容（合理性与结果性与合理性以及结果性与中立性）和（b）请求形式（规定性与规定性）。通过调查评估迹象的说服力的主观水平（N = 240）后，我们在自然实验中观察到人们的依从性（N = 1.440）。包含正当理由和后果信息的标牌均获得最高评分和实际遵守。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号