• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Sophia >Leibniz and Luther on the Non-Cognitive Component of Faith
【24h】

Leibniz and Luther on the Non-Cognitive Component of Faith

机译：莱布尼兹和路德论信仰的非认知成分

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Leibniz was a Lutheran. Yet, upon consideration of certain aspects of his philosophical theology, one might suspect that he was a Lutheran more in name than in intellectual practice. Clearly Leibniz was influenced by the Catholic tradition; this is beyond doubt. However, the extent to which Leibniz was influenced by his own Lutheran tradition—indeed, by Martin Luther himself—has yet to be satisfactorily explored. In this essay, the views of Luther and Leibniz on the non-cognitive component of faith are considered in some detail. According to Luther, the only non-cognitive aspect of faith worth favoring is trust (fiducia), since it is trust in God’s promise of mercy that warrants justification for the sinner. Leibniz, for his part, sides with the Thomistic tradition in emphasizing love (caritas) as the non-cognitive element of faith par excellence. I argue that Leibniz falls into a trap forewarned by Luther himself, even if Leibniz had systematic metaphysical reasons for his disagreement.
机译：莱布尼兹是路德教会的信徒。然而，考虑到他的哲学神学的某些方面，人们可能会怀疑他是路德派，其名字多于思想实践。显然，莱布尼兹受天主教传统的影响。这是毫无疑问的。但是，莱布尼兹受其自己的路德教传统（实际上是马丁·路德本人）的影响程度尚待令人满意地探讨。在本文中，将详细讨论路德和莱布尼兹对信仰的非认知成分的看法。路德认为，值得偏爱的信念的唯一非认知方面是信任（基准），因为对上帝对仁慈的应许的信任才能为罪人辩护。莱布尼兹则坚持汤姆主义传统，强调爱（明爱）是卓越信念的非认知元素。我认为，莱布尼兹陷入了路德本人预先警告的陷阱，即使莱布尼兹有系统的形而上学原因导致了他的分歧。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号