• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. A >Cartesian critters can't remember
【24h】

Cartesian critters can't remember

机译：笛卡尔小动物不记得了

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Descartes held the following view of declarative memory: to remember is to reconstruct an idea that you intellectually recognize as a reconstruction. Descartes countenanced two overarching varieties of declarative memory. To have an intellectual memory is to intellectually reconstruct a universal idea that you recognize as a reconstruction, and to have a sensory memory is to neurophysiologically reconstruct a particular idea that you recognize as a reconstruction. Sensory remembering is thus a capacity of neither ghosts nor machines, but only of human beings qua mind-body unions. This interpretation unifies Descartes's various remarks (and conspicuous silences) about remembering, from the 1628 Rules for the Direction of the Mind through the suppressed-in-1633 Treatise of Man to the 1649 Passions of the Soul. It also rebuts a prevailing thesis in the current secondary literature that Cartesian critters can remember while incorporating the textual evidence for that thesis Descartes's detailed descriptions of the corporeal mechanisms that construct sensory memories. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译：笛卡尔持有以下声明式记忆观点：记住是要重构一个您在智力上认识为重构的想法。笛卡尔赞扬了声明式记忆的两个主要变体。拥有智力记忆就是从智力上重构您认为是重构的通用概念，而拥有感官记忆就是从神经生理学上重构您认为是重构的特定概念。因此，感官记忆既不是鬼魂也不是机器的能力，而仅仅是人与身心的结合。这种解释统一了笛卡尔关于记忆的各种说法（以及明显的沉默），从1628年的《思想指导规则》到1633年的《人类论》被压制到1649年的《心灵激情》。它也驳斥了当前二级文献中的一个流行的论点，即笛卡尔的小动物可以记住，同时结合了文本证据，证明了笛卡尔对构成感觉记忆的物质机制的详细描述。 （C）2018 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号