• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. A >Atoms, complexes, and demonstration: Posterior analytics 96b 15-25
【24h】

Atoms, complexes, and demonstration: Posterior analytics 96b 15-25

机译：原子，复合物和演示：后验分析96b 15-25

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

There is agreement neither concerning the point that is being made in Posterior analytics 96b15-25 nor the issue Aristotle intends to address. There are two major lines of interpretation of this passage. According to one, sketched by Themistius and developed by Philopo-nus and Eustratius, Aristotle is primarily concerned with determining the definitions of the infimae species that fall under a certain genus. They understand Aristotle as arguing that this requires collating definitional predictions, seeing which are common to which species. Pacius, on the other hand, takes Aristotle to be saying that a genus is studied scientifically through first determining the infimae species that fall under that genus. This interpretation attributes to Aristotle a distinction between primary and derivative subjects. I argue for Pacius's interpretation, defending it against Barnes's objections.
机译：关于后验分析96b15-25中提出的观点，或者亚里士多德打算解决的问题，都没有达成共识。这段经文有两条主要解释。根据一个由Themistius绘制并由Philopo-nus和Eustratius开发的人，亚里斯多德主要关注确定属于某个属的肺炎物种的定义。他们认为亚里士多德认为这需要整理定义性的预测，看看哪些物种共同。另一方面，Pacius认为亚里士多德是通过首先确定属于该属的肺炎物种来科学地研究该属的。这种解释将亚里士多德归为主要科目和派生科目之间的区别。我为帕丘斯的解释辩护，反对巴恩斯的反对。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号