• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Team Performance Management >Characteristics of routine, development and idea networks in teams
【24h】

Characteristics of routine, development and idea networks in teams

机译：团队常规，发展和想法网络的特征

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to propose that there is not one ideal network structure ofrnknowledge flow, but many, and that the network structures of knowledge flows between employees inrnteams are task-related.rnDesign/methodology/approach - Ideal knowledge network structures in teams are examined onrnthe basis of the literature. A case study of a well-established team, presented with social networkrnanalysis methods, reveals the different structures of knowledge flow.rnFindings - According to the case study, it is shown that the network structures of knowledge flowrnare different in different tasks. It is suggested on the basis of theory that the ideal knowledge networkrnstructures are hierarchical for routine tasks, core-peripheral for development tasks and ego-centric forrnidea generation tasks.rnResearch limitations/implications - The research design presented in this paper should bernapplied to more cases to ascertain its validity.rnPractical implications - This paper provides means for understanding, assessing and managingrnknowledge networks in teams.rnOriginality/value - Flows of knowledge have been found to be an important area in networkrnresearch. This paper shows how they are structured according to the nature of the tasks.
机译：目的-本文的目的是建议没有一个理想的知识流网络结构，而是很多，并且员工团队之间的知识流的网络结构与任务相关。设计/方法/方法-理想的知识网络结构团队在文献的基础上进行检查。以一个建立良好的团队为例，采用社交网络分析方法，揭示了知识流的不同结构。rn发现-根据案例研究，表明知识流的网络结构在不同任务中是不同的。根据理论建议，理想的知识网络结构对于日常任务是分层的，对于发展任务是核心外围的，对于以自我为中心的杀虫剂的生成任务。研究的局限/意义-本文提出的研究设计应适用于更多情况实践意义-本文为理解，评估和管理团队中的知识网络提供了手段。原创性/价值-知识流动被发现是网络研究的重要领域。本文展示了如何根据任务的性质来组织它们。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号