...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The Cerebellum >Cerebellum and cognition—Viewed from philosophy of mind
【24h】

Cerebellum and cognition—Viewed from philosophy of mind

机译：小脑与认知-从心灵哲学的角度看

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Traditionally, it is believed, that the primary function of the cerebellum is to coordinate movement. During the past three decades, it has been controversially discussed, whether the cerebellum may also contribute to cognition and mental states like emotions. In this paper, no position relating to this controversy will be taken. Instead, the hypothesis of non-motor functions of the cerebellum will be viewed from the position of the philosophy of mind. The remarkably uniform microscopic structure and neuronal networks of the cerebellum have led to computer analogies by several authors. The main idea of functionalism, i.e., a theory within the philosophy of mind, is that the mental relates to the physical as computer software does to hardware. This raises the question, whether a cerebellar contribution to cognition and mental states would support functionalism in the philosophy of mind. No support of functionalism could be found in this study, investigating the classical philosophical arguments pro and con functionalism such as those of multiple realizability, the Chinese room and the explanatory gap, while taking the results of cerebellar research into account. On the other hand, philosophical reflection suggests a careful use of the phrases “cognitive dysmetria” (Andreasen et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:9985–90) in the context of mental illness and of “dysmetria of thought” (Schmahmann Arch Neurol. 1991;48:1178–87). According to the argument of the explanatory gap there is at present little support for the assumption that the phenomenal experiencing of an altered emotion can be reduced to the dysmetria of movement.
机译：传统上认为，小脑的主要功能是协调运动。在过去的三十年中，关于小脑是否也可能有助于认知和精神状态（如情绪），一直存在争议。在本文中，将不涉及与此争议有关的立场。取而代之的是，小脑的非运动功能假说将从心智哲学的立场来看。小脑非常一致的微观结构和神经元网络导致了几位作者的计算机类比。功能主义的主要思想，即心智哲学中的一种理论，是心智与身体相关，就像计算机软件对硬件一样。这就提出了一个问题，即小脑对认知和心理状态的贡献是否会支持心理哲学中的功能主义。在这项研究中没有发现功能主义的支持，而是在考虑小脑研究结果的同时，研究了古典哲学论证的功能主义和反功能主义，例如多重可实现性，中国空间和解释性空白。另一方面，哲学思考建议在精神疾病和“思想障碍”的背景下谨慎使用“认知障碍”（Andreasen等，Proc Natl Acad Sci USA。1996; 93：9985–90）。 （Schmahmann Arch Neurol。1991; 48：1178-87）。根据解释性差距的观点，目前很少有人支持这样一种假设，即情感改变的现象可以减少为运动异常。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Cerebellum》 |2007年第4期|328-334|共7页
  • 作者

    M. Frings; M. Maschke; D. Timmann;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Neurology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstra?e 55, D-45122 Essen, Germany;

    Department of Neurology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstra?e 55, D-45122 Essen, Germany;

    Department of Neurology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstra?e 55, D-45122 Essen, Germany;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Cerebellum; cognition; philosophy of mind;

    机译：小脑;认识;心灵哲学;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号